Nonclassical Paths in Quantum Interference Experiments

Abstract

In a double slit interference experiment, the wave function at the screen with both slits open is not exactly equal to the sum of the wave functions with the slits individually open one at a time. The three scenarios represent three different boundary conditions and as such, the superposition principle should not be applicable. However, most well-known text books in quantum mechanics implicitly and/or explicitly use this assumption that is only approximately true. In our present study, we have used the Feynman path integral formalism to quantify contributions from nonclassical paths in quantum interference experiments that provide a measurable deviation from a naive application of the superposition principle. A direct experimental demonstration for the existence of these nonclassical paths is difficult to present. We find that contributions from such paths can be significant and we propose simple three-slit interference experiments to directly confirm their existence.

Interference enhanced thermoelectricity in quinoid type structures

“…7,[40][41][42][43] Here, we rationalise the QI interference features in terms of molecular orbitals and corresponding molecular energies. This has the advantage that in the weak molecule lead coupling limit this analysis can be generalised for the correlated electron case by considering so-called Dyson orbitals and energies.…”

The Quantum Triple-Slit Experiment and Dark Energy

“…Rather than repeating the mathematical analysis of this paper we think nothing can be simpler and far more convenient for the reader than comparing Figure 1 of Ref. [2] with Figure 2 of our earlier publication, Ref. [8].…”

Exotic looped trajectories via quantum marking

“…In Sorkin's work, higher-order phenomena were added to the usual prescription of interference when three or more paths interfered. It was only more recently that quantification of the contribution from exotic paths in interference experiments for triple-slits was proposed [3,[7][8][9].…”