2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.032119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclassical nature of dispersion cancellation and nonlocal interferometry

Abstract: Several recent papers have shown that some forms of dispersion cancellation have classical analogs and that some aspects of nonlocal two-photon interferometry are consistent with local realistic models. It is noted here that the classical analogs only apply to local dispersion cancellation experiments [A.M. Steinberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2421(1992] and that nonlocal dispersion cancellation [J.D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126 (1992)] is inconsistent with any classical field theory and has no classical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(120 reference statements)
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experimental results also contribute to a longstanding discussion about differences between heralded and ‘true' single photons32333435. The atomic excitation dynamics caused by heralded single photons matches well the one expected from ‘true' single photon states in our theoretical model, and therefore support a realistic interpretation of photons prepared in a heralding process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Our experimental results also contribute to a longstanding discussion about differences between heralded and ‘true' single photons32333435. The atomic excitation dynamics caused by heralded single photons matches well the one expected from ‘true' single photon states in our theoretical model, and therefore support a realistic interpretation of photons prepared in a heralding process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One way to deal with this "postselection loophole" that affects all performed Bell tests using energy-time-or time-binentangled photons [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] is to add an extra assumption: the fact that a photon is detected at a specific time is independent * paolo.mataloni@uniroma1.it of the local experiment performed on that photon [27,29]. Therefore, even assuming ideal devices, Franson's setup can only rule out local LHV theories when this extra property is assumed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6], there is a unified Gaussian-state analysis capable of treating all of these nonclassical phenomena and more, e.g., the dispersion cancellation experiment of Steinberg et al [7] and the ghost imaging experiment of Pittman et al [8], both of which relied on biphoton explanations. Recently, Franson [9] has argued that his dispersion cancellation paradigm [10] differs from that of Steinberg et al in that the former is nonlocal, whereas the latter is not. More importantly, in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More importantly, in Ref. [9] Franson reviews various classical strawmen that have been suggested as providing explanations for his nonlocal dispersion cancellation and shows that each of them fails to reproduce one or more of the major features of quantum nonlocal dispersion cancellation. Hence, he concludes that nonlocal dispersion cancellation is a fundamentally quantum effect akin to violation of Bell's inequality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%