2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonattendance in pediatric pulmonary clinics: an ambulatory survey

Abstract: BackgroundNonattendance for scheduled appointments disturbs the effective management of pediatric pulmonary clinics. We hypothesized that the reasons for non-attendance and the necessary solutions might be different in pediatric pulmonary medicine than in other pediatric fields. We therefore investigated the factors associated with nonattendance this field in order to devise a corrective strategy.MethodsThe effect of age, gender, ethnic origin, waiting time for an appointment and the timing of appointments dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
21
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid access system was developed based on investigations of outpatient clinics in neurology and other subspecialties; these have demonstrated a strong association between longer waiting times and nonattendance. [5][6][7][8][9][10] In one report of a neurology clinic, there was a 50% difference in nonattendance for waiting times Ͼ2 months (32%) vs Յ2 months (17%). 5 Smaller differences were found for Ն1 vs Ͻ1 week in otorhinolaryngology, pulmonary medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology studies (30%-37% nonattendance for Ͼ1 week vs 24%-27% for Յ1 week, p Ͻ 0.001 for all studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The rapid access system was developed based on investigations of outpatient clinics in neurology and other subspecialties; these have demonstrated a strong association between longer waiting times and nonattendance. [5][6][7][8][9][10] In one report of a neurology clinic, there was a 50% difference in nonattendance for waiting times Ͼ2 months (32%) vs Յ2 months (17%). 5 Smaller differences were found for Ն1 vs Ͻ1 week in otorhinolaryngology, pulmonary medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology studies (30%-37% nonattendance for Ͼ1 week vs 24%-27% for Յ1 week, p Ͻ 0.001 for all studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Smaller differences were found for Ն1 vs Ͻ1 week in otorhinolaryngology, pulmonary medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology studies (30%-37% nonattendance for Ͼ1 week vs 24%-27% for Յ1 week, p Ͻ 0.001 for all studies). [7][8][9] We chose a 3-week maximum waiting time for rapid access since it is a practical period for nonurgent scheduling in a medical subspecialty. [7][8][9] Introduction of the new system was not associated with any measurable changes in demographics or diagnoses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations