2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06551-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonanatomical reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients treated with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Purpose Negative buttress reduction should be avoided in the treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) using conventional fixation. As the femoral neck system (FNS) has been recently developed and utilized widely to treat FNFs, the association of reduction quality with postoperative complications and clinical function has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of nonanatomical reduction in young patients with FNFs treated with FNS. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in some studies, patients treated with positive buttress reduction had a higher rate of excellent Harris scores (> 80 points) than those treated with anatomical reduction [ 26 , 27 ] ( P < 0.05). The patients treated with positive buttress reduction and anatomical reduction had a better Harris hip score than those treated with negative buttress reduction ( P < 0.05) [ 28 – 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some studies, patients treated with positive buttress reduction had a higher rate of excellent Harris scores (> 80 points) than those treated with anatomical reduction [ 26 , 27 ] ( P < 0.05). The patients treated with positive buttress reduction and anatomical reduction had a better Harris hip score than those treated with negative buttress reduction ( P < 0.05) [ 28 – 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of reduction in displaced femoral neck fractures is known to influence patient outcomes and postoperative complications 5,[7][8][9]15,16 . Assessing reductions with 2D fluoroscopy can be limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although FNS has stronger anti-rotation and anti-inversion capabilities than cannulated screw, it must rely on the contact of the fracture to provide anti-shortening reaction force, and the reduction of the effective contact surface of the fracture due to cortical comminution and poor reduction will lead to an increase in the incidence of shortening. The main risk factors for shortening after FNS fixation include the combination of cortical comminution, displaced fracture, and the quality of reduction [ 19 , 32 , 33 ]. At the same time, the FNS reserved 20 mm of sliding space, and the resistance to shortening was based on the cortical contact of the fracture, which was prone to over shortening in the postoperative period due to poor fracture reduction and cortical comminution that prevented the formation of cortical contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%