2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.121401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonadiabatic effects in atom-surface charge transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a very recent calculation, this seems to be related to a much larger Li (2 s) level width [28] than predicted by earlier DFT calculations [19,20,23]. Another possible problem may be that a rate equation approach for determining the level populations, used in such descriptions, may not be suitable for a situation where the atomic level stays close to the Fermi level for large atom-surface distances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a very recent calculation, this seems to be related to a much larger Li (2 s) level width [28] than predicted by earlier DFT calculations [19,20,23]. Another possible problem may be that a rate equation approach for determining the level populations, used in such descriptions, may not be suitable for a situation where the atomic level stays close to the Fermi level for large atom-surface distances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results of this study need to be put into the perspective of a complex problem related in general to alkali ion neutralization on metal surfaces. While alkali neutralization on bulk metal surfaces seemed well understood [18][19][20], recent experiments [21][22][23][24] revealed very wide discrepancies with predictions of these "standard" jellium-like models of metals using a rate equation approach to describe neutralization. It was indeed found, as may also be seen in the Au thin film limit of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, charge transfer rates should vary depending on the energetic positions of the projectile ionization or affinity levels and indeed such effects have been found using the CHC method outlined above [14]. Theory [17,18] and experiment [18] show that the signature of the band structure in the charge transfer rates vanishes for increasing particle energies, corresponding to decreasing interaction times. We will see that this aspect is also of fundamental importance for experiments with attosecond light pulses and their interpretation.…”
Section: Scattering Experiments and Band Structure Buildupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at higher collision velocity perpendicular to the surface revealed that the situation is more complex and that the effect of the target electronic structure is not always as obvious as in the above-mentioned systems [15,16]. [16]) Figure 3 presents the neutralization probability of Li + ions colliding on a Ag(100) surface as a function of the projectile energy in the few hundreds eV range [16].…”
Section: Collisional Charge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%