2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9071166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonadditive Grey Prediction Using Functional-Link Net for Energy Demand Forecasting

Abstract: Abstract:Energy demand prediction plays an important role in sustainable development. The GM(1,1) model has drawn our attention to energy demand forecasting because it only needs a few data points to construct a time series model without statistical assumptions. Residual modification is often considered as well to improve the accuracy of predictions. Several residual modification models have been proposed, but they focused on residual sign estimation, whereas the FLNGM(1,1) model using functional-link net (FLN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction accuracy of a grey prediction model can be improved by constructing a residual model (Liu and Lin, 2010), an approach that has been verified effective in the GM(1,1) model by many studies (Hu, 2017a, 2017b; Hu and Jiang, 2017). Some scholars applied the traditional GM(1,1) model (Pi et al , 2010), Markov-chain (Ye et al , 2018), Fourier series (Peng et al , 2017) and neural network (Hu and Jiang, 2017) as residual modification model to construct the residual GM(1,1) model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction accuracy of a grey prediction model can be improved by constructing a residual model (Liu and Lin, 2010), an approach that has been verified effective in the GM(1,1) model by many studies (Hu, 2017a, 2017b; Hu and Jiang, 2017). Some scholars applied the traditional GM(1,1) model (Pi et al , 2010), Markov-chain (Ye et al , 2018), Fourier series (Peng et al , 2017) and neural network (Hu and Jiang, 2017) as residual modification model to construct the residual GM(1,1) model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecasting results obtained by linear regression and the MLP are summarized in Table 2 . It is clear that the prediction accuracy values of linear regression on the training and testing data were 4.20% and 27.76%, respectively [ 13 ], whereas those of the MLP on the training and testing data were 3.85% and 18.30%, respectively [ 20 ]. Therefore, the proposed GARGM(1,1) outperforms linear regression and the MLP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grey forecasting model, as one of the significant constituents of grey system theory, has attracted attention and has been actively studied by many scholars. The GM(1,1) model is the most important part of grey prediction theory; however, many scholars discovered that the prediction precision of this model is unstable, and extensive research mainly on the following topics has been conducted: Converting an original sequence for improvement of smoothness [12]; enhancing the computational methods of parameters [13][14][15][16]; modifying residuals of models [17][18][19]; reforming the modelling fashion, and performing some preparations for expanding GM(1,1) models [20]; investigating the modelling conditions [21]; extending the structure of traditional grey prediction models [22]; optimizing the parameters of grey prediction models, such as initial value [23,24], background value [25,26], and the order of accumulating generation operators [27,28]; and combining the grey prediction model with other modelling methods [29,30].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%