2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10240-007-0010-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonabelian Hodge theory in characteristic p

Abstract: Given a scheme in characteristic p together with a lifting modulo p 2 , we construct a functor from a category of suitably nilpotent modules with connection to the category of Higgs modules. We use this functor to generalize the decomposition theorem of Deligne-Illusie to the case of de Rham cohomology with coefficients. IntroductionLet X/C be a smooth projective scheme over the complex numbers and let X an be the associated analytic space. Classical Hodge theory provides a canonical isomorphism:Carlos Simps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
190
0
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
190
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that the restriction U −ρ of U under the embedding [BrBr,Proposition 3.7] or [OV,Theorem 2.4], this bimodule provides an equivalence between the two Azumaya algebras ι * (D B ) and pr * (D P ). Hence, for line bundles O B,ν on B and O P,λ on P the sheaf…”
Section: Twisted D-modules On Parabolic Flagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that the restriction U −ρ of U under the embedding [BrBr,Proposition 3.7] or [OV,Theorem 2.4], this bimodule provides an equivalence between the two Azumaya algebras ι * (D B ) and pr * (D P ). Hence, for line bundles O B,ν on B and O P,λ on P the sheaf…”
Section: Twisted D-modules On Parabolic Flagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalence of (1) and (5) is the original result of Deligne and Illusie [8]. The implication (1) ⇒ (2) was proven by Ogus and Vologodsky [10], where a splitting module is explicitly constructed. The implications (2) ⇒ (3) ⇒ (4) ⇒ (5) ⇒ (2) are parts of Theorem 3.7, and give a geometric interpretation of Deligne and Illusie's result.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, locally V i is isomorphic to the Frobenius pull back of E i (see [31,Theorem 2.8,3]), so it is locally free. Now note that there exists a family whose general member is isomorphic to V i−1 and the special one is E i .…”
Section: Lemma 3 If In a Higgs-de Rham Sequence Of (E θ) There Existmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algebraic proof of Bogomolov's inequality for Higgs sheaves became possible only after the appearance of Ogus and Vologodsky's non-abelian Hodge theory in positive characteristic (see [31]). We also use in a crucial way the results of [21] to prove a weak version of Bogomolov's inequality for semistable modules with generalized connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%