2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non–Weight-Bearing and Weight-Bearing Ultrasonography of Select Foot Muscles in Young, Asymptomatic Participants: A Descriptive and Reliability Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, this is the first study to report a reliable method for measuring the TP CSA using US. Our ICC scores were similar to or higher than those reported for other lower extremity muscles, which ranged from 0.57 to 0.99 15,26,29,30,34–36 . The SEM and LoA were also comparable to or lower than those seen in other studies 26,29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as we know, this is the first study to report a reliable method for measuring the TP CSA using US. Our ICC scores were similar to or higher than those reported for other lower extremity muscles, which ranged from 0.57 to 0.99 15,26,29,30,34–36 . The SEM and LoA were also comparable to or lower than those seen in other studies 26,29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our ICC scores were similar to or higher than those reported for other lower extremity muscles, which ranged from 0.57 to 0.99. 15,26,29,30,[34][35][36] The SEM and LoA were also comparable to or lower than those seen in other studies. 26,29,30 For thickness measurements, our LoA ranged from 5.8% to 9.7%, whereas other researchers saw a range of 9% to 18% for foot and leg muscles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A comparison of our results to previous studies that focused on still images further supports the benefits of cine loops. We showed comparable ICCs as several previous studies but lower LoAs in those studies reporting these additional metrics . Although ICCs have been traditionally used to evaluate reliability, they are highly affected by the subject's measurement range and may inflate the true reliability for this type of application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although optimal US settings (eg, transducer and frequency selection, depth, and focus position) are assumed across studies, transducer placement strategies and techniques have not been well standardized. Measurements of the foot muscles, for example, have been performed at the thickest part of the muscle, 50% of the foot length, and various positions on the leg referenced to internal bony landmarks . When measuring the abductor hallucis (ABDH) thickness, Mickle et al 20 found higher intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and lower limits of agreement (LoAs) when using the medial malleolus landmark as opposed to the thickest part of the muscle, suggesting that the use of landmarks is likely more reliable than image‐based subjective locations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertester reliability of these measurements have been found to be good to excellent. 30 The average measurement of the 3 images were utilized for analysis in each condition. Measures of active and resisted contraction were normalized to resting measures and reported as an activation ratio, 10,14,31 calculated using the formula: Activation ratio = Contracted measurement Resting measurement :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%