2010
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2010.507338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-universality of von Kármán's κ in fluvial streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported a reduction of j that could be expressed by a non-linear function of the bedload volume concentration. [13] performed a review of previous work on the characterisation of the vertical profile of the mean longitudinal velocity to highlight the fact that there is no necessary argument for the universality of the van Kármán constant and that there exists a substantial number of databases whose interpretation favours the hypothesis of a reduction of the value of j with sediment transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported a reduction of j that could be expressed by a non-linear function of the bedload volume concentration. [13] performed a review of previous work on the characterisation of the vertical profile of the mean longitudinal velocity to highlight the fact that there is no necessary argument for the universality of the van Kármán constant and that there exists a substantial number of databases whose interpretation favours the hypothesis of a reduction of the value of j with sediment transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dey and Raikar (2007) studied the turbulence characteristics in flows over gravel beds near the threshold. They obtained the von Kármán constant as 0.35, which was different from its traditional value of 0.41 (also see Gaudio et al 2010). Despite a number of serious efforts, there remain a lot of unanswered questions in quantifying the bursting events related to sediment entrainment and the role of near-bed turbulence on sediment threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hydraulically rough flow, which is universal in bedrock rapids, the parameter z o is a bed roughness length scale and k, the von Kármán constant, can reasonably be set to equal 0.4 in deep rivers where the suspended sediment load is small (Smart, 1999;Gaudio et al, 2010). Only profile fits with r 2 values greater than 0.60 were considered to be acceptable within the Results section.…”
Section: Theoretical Velocity Profile Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%