2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1911.04804
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uniform Stability of Damped Contraction Semigroups

Abstract: We investigate the stability properties of strongly continuous semigroups generated by operators of the form A − BB * , where A is a generator of a contraction semigroup and B is a possibly unbounded operator. Such systems arise naturally in the study of hyperbolic partial differential equations with damping on the boundary or inside the spatial domain. As our main results we present general sufficient conditions for non-uniform stability of the semigroup generated by A − BB * in terms of selected observabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our assumptions together with the results in [15] and [11,Prop. 3.9] also imply that the condition (2.5) is satisfied for some functions η : R → (0, η 0 ] and δ : R → (0, δ 0 ] satisfying η(s) −2 δ(s) −2 ≤ M 0 (1 + s 2 ) for all s ∈ R. Because of this, Theorem 2.3 could in principle be used to derive numerical values for κ > 0 for particular damping functions d(•, •).…”
Section: Perturbations Of Damped 2-d Wave Equationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our assumptions together with the results in [15] and [11,Prop. 3.9] also imply that the condition (2.5) is satisfied for some functions η : R → (0, η 0 ] and δ : R → (0, δ 0 ] satisfying η(s) −2 δ(s) −2 ≤ M 0 (1 + s 2 ) for all s ∈ R. Because of this, Theorem 2.3 could in principle be used to derive numerical values for κ > 0 for particular damping functions d(•, •).…”
Section: Perturbations Of Damped 2-d Wave Equationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The following theorem introduces a concrete bound κ > 0 for the norms of the perturbations in Theorem 2.2 for A = A 0 − DD * with a skew-adjoint operator A 0 in the important special case β, γ ≥ 0 are chosen so that β + γ = ⌈α⌉ (here ⌈α⌉ ∈ N denotes the ceiling of α > 0). The first part of the result is a special case of [11,Thm. 3.5] with a proof that has been modified in a trivial manner to yield an explicit constant M R > 0.…”
Section: Definition 21 ([8]mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2.6] (see also [32,Rem. 2.7]), which is a discrete analogue of [6,Prop. 5.4] and proves that decay strictly faster than m −1 (cn) for all c > 0 as n → ∞ is impossible provided R(e iθ , T ) does not grow strictly more slowly than m(|θ|) as θ → 0.…”
Section: An Optimal Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have thus obtained that the pair (A, B) satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 1.1 in [21] with δ given by (6.14) and…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%