2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uniform spline recovery from small degree polynomial approximation

Abstract: We investigate the sparse spikes deconvolution problem onto spaces of algebraic polynomials. Our framework encompasses the measure reconstruction problem from a combination of noiseless and noisy moment measurements. We study a TVnorm regularization procedure to localize the support and estimate the weights of a target discrete measure in this frame. Furthermore, we derive quantitative bounds on the support recovery and the amplitude errors under a Chebyshev-type minimal separation condition on its support. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A consecutive paper [12] showed that the recovery is robust to noisy measurements. Similar results are given for support detection from low Fourier coefficients [4], [23], recovery of non-uniform splines from their projection onto spaces of algebraic polynomials [8], [18] and recovery of streams of pulses [6], [9]. (see also [17]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A consecutive paper [12] showed that the recovery is robust to noisy measurements. Similar results are given for support detection from low Fourier coefficients [4], [23], recovery of non-uniform splines from their projection onto spaces of algebraic polynomials [8], [18] and recovery of streams of pulses [6], [9]. (see also [17]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Up to now, these method were applied to projections onto trigonometric [10], [12], [13], [15], [52], [53], [55] and algebraic polynomial spaces [8], [18]. This work showed that it can be applied to the sphere as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For h : C n × R → R defined by h = persp( · 2 /2), one can write the primal in the form P λ (µ, σ) = τ z (h)(F n (µ), nσ)+σ/2+f (µ, σ), where z = (y, 0) ∈ C n × R and f (µ, σ) = λ µ TV + I R++ . Then, we can apply [4,Proposition,19.18], with g : C n × R → R by g(·, σ) = τ z (h)(·, nσ) + σ/2 and L = F n . This leads to the Lagrangian formulation L(µ, σ, c, t) := f (µ, σ) + F n (µ), c + σt − g * (c, t) .…”
Section: E2 Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, it was suggested to recast Total-Variation (TV) and atomic norm minimization as semi-definite programs (SDP) in order to recover point sources from low-resolution data on the line [13,12], and on the sphere [7,8,9], or for line spectral estimation [10,47,46]. Similar approach was applied to the recovery of non-uniform splines from their projection onto algebraic polynomial spaces [6,20] (see also [18,1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%