1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04481.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐Uniform Blood Flow in the Left Ventricular Wall of Dogs Measured by the Xe‐133 Wash‐out Technique

Abstract: Intra‐myocardial injections of Xe‐133 into the left ventricular wall revealed time‐activity curves which indicate that blood flow in the subepicardial layers is 30 % greater than in the subendocardial layers. A two‐compartment model of the ventricular wall was therefore considered, and a good correlation was found between this model and the results of graphical and computer analyses of time‐activity curves obtained by injections of Xe‐133 into the left coronary artery. The flows of these two compartments and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies on myocardial flow distribution using washout of locally injected depots of a radioactive tracer have consistently shown a smaller flow rate in deep regions, averaging 70% of flow to superficial regions in the unstressed heart (3,4). This observation is at variance with the present and previous findings (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Control Preloadcontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, studies on myocardial flow distribution using washout of locally injected depots of a radioactive tracer have consistently shown a smaller flow rate in deep regions, averaging 70% of flow to superficial regions in the unstressed heart (3,4). This observation is at variance with the present and previous findings (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Control Preloadcontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…This observation is at variance with the present and previous findings (7)(8)(9)(10). In addition, myocardial flow determined from locally injected depots has shown a smaller flow rate compared with flow rates determined from intracoronary injections (4). It is conceivable that the volume of the intramyocardial injectate increases local tissue pressure in excess of that effectively counteracted by the autoregulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Control Preloadcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The lamellar hypothesis of hippocampal function in its simplest original form posited that excitatory activity travels from the entorhinal cortex and through the hippocampus via a “trisynaptic circuit” lying within a series of parallel hippocampal “slices” or “lamellae” (Andersen et al, 1969, 1971). In this way, it was envisaged that temporal lobe interactions between the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus were organized topographically, and that “lamellae” might operate independently, permitting a relatively simple structure to mediate complex behaviors.…”
Section: Origins Of the Lamellar Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lamellar hypothesis as originally conceived (Andersen et al, 1969) was greatly influenced by the still unpublished anatomical findings of Blackstad and his colleagues in Århus, Denmark, who had made two observations based on the distribution of degenerating fibers after focal injury in the dentate gyrus or entorhinal cortex. First, Blackstad et al (1970) reported that after small lesions of the dentate gyrus, degenerating mossy fibers exhibited a “lamellar” pattern in the transverse plane, and they also noted that “very narrow bands were seen in a few animals with particularly small lesions.” Second, Andersen and colleagues cited as a personal communication from Jeune the subsequently published finding that, “each specific level of the entorhinal area distributes fibers to a restricted segment of the hippocampus” (Hjorth-Simonsen and Jeune, 1972).…”
Section: Origins Of the Lamellar Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hippocampus consists of three main fields, dentate gyrus (DG), areas CA3 and CA1, and each field displays unique anatomical, molecular, and connectivity patterns [11, 12]. The tri-synaptic circuit conducts synaptic transmission in the hippocampus, and consists of three major excitatory synaptic pathways: perforant path (PP) → DG, mossy fiber (MF) → CA3, and Schaffer collateral (SC) → CA1 [13]. All three hippocampal pathways have been associated with learning and memory [1416], and disruption of the hippocampal network has been implicated in AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%