2018
DOI: 10.5070/v42811055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Trapping, Non-Invasive, Rapid Surveillance Sampling Using Tracking Tunnels, Trail Cameras, and eDNA to Determine Presence of Pest Predator Species

Abstract: A common challenge for land managers is knowing which vertebrate pest species are present in areas they manage, especially if such areas are remote like isolated habitats, rugged terrain, or infrequently traveled islands. Most invasive predator species, such as feral dogs, cats, mongoose, and commensal rodents pose great threat to human health and key resources such as native species. Animal trapping to determine the presence of a pest species can be expensive and dangerous, requiring permits, experienced pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The e cacy of rodent monitoring methods in different management scenarios therefore warrants careful assessment. Some of the most commonly used devices to monitor the presence of rodents include motion-triggered camera traps, chew cards, and tracking tunnels (Shiels et al 2018;Nottingham et al 2021). There are distinct bene ts and challenges with the use of each of these devices as rodent monitoring tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The e cacy of rodent monitoring methods in different management scenarios therefore warrants careful assessment. Some of the most commonly used devices to monitor the presence of rodents include motion-triggered camera traps, chew cards, and tracking tunnels (Shiels et al 2018;Nottingham et al 2021). There are distinct bene ts and challenges with the use of each of these devices as rodent monitoring tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in chew marks can yield species-speci c data, though excessive chewing by some species can mask the presence of others (Burge et al 2017). Tracking tunnels can similarly yield speciesspeci c data for small mammals through the analysis of inked footprints (Shiels et al 2018). Due to 'shyness' or neophobia of some animals however, the use of tracking tunnels may under-estimate presence and subsequent density estimates (Cooper et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%