2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-tight and tight chemomechanical couplings of biomolecular motors under hindering loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We denote by k (+) the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the head with the forward NL orientation (e.g., the trailing head) and by k (−) the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the head without the forward NL orientation (e.g., the leading head). Rates k (+) and k (−) are independent of the force on the NLs, which are consistent with the available experimental data (see, e.g., [17][18][19] for detailed discussion). We denote by k D the rate of ADP release from the head bound to MT, which for simplicity is treated here to be independent of NL direction and force on NL.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Single Eg5-∆tail Moving On Single Mtsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We denote by k (+) the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the head with the forward NL orientation (e.g., the trailing head) and by k (−) the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the head without the forward NL orientation (e.g., the leading head). Rates k (+) and k (−) are independent of the force on the NLs, which are consistent with the available experimental data (see, e.g., [17][18][19] for detailed discussion). We denote by k D the rate of ADP release from the head bound to MT, which for simplicity is treated here to be independent of NL direction and force on NL.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Single Eg5-∆tail Moving On Single Mtsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…where k is the ATPase rate of the motor, which is independent of F, as for the well-studied N-type kinesin-1. [39][40][41] As discussed in detail elsewhere, 31,[39][40][41] the argument of the load-independent ATPase rate for kinesin-1 is consistent with the available experimental data. [42][43][44][45] First, using Equations ( 8) and ( 9) we give an explanation of the experimental data of Molodtsov et al 21 As 8) and ( 9) it is noted only values of two parameters k and d 2 are required.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Kinesin-14 Cik1-kar3supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Consequently, after arriving at x = d 1 the motor takes a forward step and after arriving at x = − d 2 the motor takes a backward step. Then, the ratio of the probability of taking a forward step to that of taking a backward step (simply called stepping ratio) can be approximately calculated by r=t2/t1, which can be rewritten as r=d22d12exp()FdkBT. With the stepping ratio r , the velocity of the motor can be written as v=r1r+1italickd, where k is the ATPase rate of the motor, which is independent of F , as for the well‐studied N‐type kinesin‐1 39–41 . As discussed in detail elsewhere, 31,39–41 the argument of the load‐independent ATPase rate for kinesin‐1 is consistent with the available experimental data 42–45 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor proteins or biomolecular motors are a group of macromolecules that typically consume the energy of a chemical reaction and convert it into mechanical motion or work to perform a myriad of biological functions in cells [1,2]. A large number of molecular motors can move processively on their linear tracks [3]. A typical class in this category is that of kinesin proteins, which can move processively on microtubule (MT) filaments towards the plus end by hydrolyzing ATP molecules, responsible for intracellular transport, chromosome segregation during mitosis, regulation of MT dynamics and so on [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%