2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18652.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-thermal radiation from Type Ia supernova remnants

Abstract: We present calculations of expected continuum emissions from Sedov-Taylor phase Type Ia supernova remnants (SNRs), using the energy spectra of cosmic ray (CR) electrons and protons from non-linear diffusive shock acceleration simulations. A new, general-purpose radiative process code, COSMICP, was employed to calculate the radiation expected from CR electrons and protons and their secondary products. These radio, X-ray and gamma-ray emissions are generally consistent with current observations of Type Ia SNRs. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, p e,br (t) decreases from 10 2.8 m p c to 10 2.5 m p c for t/t o = 0.5 − 5 in W1 model. The peak of G e (p) near p e,max comes from the electron population in the upstream region, which cools much less efficiently due to weaker magnetic field there (Edmon et al 2011). Because of the same reason, the X-ray synchrotron emission due to this population of upstream electrons would be much less pronounced, compared to the electron energy spectrum.…”
Section: Dsa Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, p e,br (t) decreases from 10 2.8 m p c to 10 2.5 m p c for t/t o = 0.5 − 5 in W1 model. The peak of G e (p) near p e,max comes from the electron population in the upstream region, which cools much less efficiently due to weaker magnetic field there (Edmon et al 2011). Because of the same reason, the X-ray synchrotron emission due to this population of upstream electrons would be much less pronounced, compared to the electron energy spectrum.…”
Section: Dsa Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We set B r = 6.5 µG, including the cosmic background and mean Galactic radiation fields (Edmon et al 2011). The cooling term is set to be b(p) = 0 for protons.…”
Section: Crash Code For Dsamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to what is widely considered, SNR RX J1713.7−3946 is not in the ST stage. Because the total energy content of cosmic rays has to be large enough to produce the observed gamma rays regardless of the emission models (see Edmon et al 2011), a very young evolutional stage in Models 1, 2, 9, and 10 where tage ≪ tST would be inappropriate.…”
Section: Evolutional Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the non-thermal emission of particles, we use the general-purpose code AURA (P. P. Edmon, 2012, private communication), which is a rewrite of the code COSMICP presented in Edmon et al (2011). It makes use of the formalism of Schlickeiser (2002) for leptonic processes, and of the formalism of Kelner et al (2006) and Kelner & Aharonian (2008) for hadronic processes.…”
Section: Particle Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%