2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4907624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-thermal plasma mills bacteria: Scanning electron microscopy observations

Abstract: Non-thermal plasmas hold great promise for a variety of biomedical applications. To ensure safe clinical application of plasma, a rigorous analysis of plasma-induced effects on cell functions is required. Yet mechanisms of bacteria deactivation by non-thermal plasma remain largely unknown. We therefore analyzed the influence of low-temperature atmospheric plasma on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Using scanning electron microscopy, we demonstrate that both Grampositive and Gram-negative bacteria stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The wound area was significantly more reduced in the rats treated with NTP than in that of the untreated rats on day 7, and also histological analysis confirmed an enhanced epithelisation and a reduced granulation tissue area after plasma treatment. Respectively, improved wound contraction after the plasma treatment has also been confirmed in other studies using NTP generated from argon, helium or nitrogen1678910111213141516171830.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wound area was significantly more reduced in the rats treated with NTP than in that of the untreated rats on day 7, and also histological analysis confirmed an enhanced epithelisation and a reduced granulation tissue area after plasma treatment. Respectively, improved wound contraction after the plasma treatment has also been confirmed in other studies using NTP generated from argon, helium or nitrogen1678910111213141516171830.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…. We have previously demonstrated, that under plasma treatment, mechanically rigid bacterial wall structures can be destroyed due to internal electrostatic pressure raised, as a result of ion accumulation9. Depending on the plasma dose and voltage value producing the plasma discharges, NTP may trigger either programmed cell death or physical destruction of the bacteria10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, according to the SCCP European Commission Report 0949/05, the maximum allowed UV dose rate is 50 μW/cm 2 , which is one order of magnitude higher than in our case 27 . Moreover, we 28 and others 29, 30 have previously shown that the UV radiation is not the dominant biological agent of non-thermal plasmas of such ion density and energy. Detailed NTP treatment procedure and plasma system characterization is given in the Materials and Methods section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Plasma treatment of tooth cavities or dental surfaces allows us to avoid contamination, actively fight bacterial infections, offer additional cleaning to the decayed matters in the tooth cavities, and prepare/ engineer the dentin and adhesive surface/interface for strong and durable bonding to composite restorative materials with a cohesive treatment process. A broad spectrum of bacteria can be deactivated/destructed by NTAP, including Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Micrococcus luteus Yu et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010;Alkawareek et al 2014;Lunov et al 2015). It was found that NTAP's antibacterial activity was not due to UV emission (Lunov et al 2015) but rather to reactive oxygen species, which led to oxidative damages to cell membrane, DNA, and proteinaceous enzymes (Alkawareek et al 2014).…”
Section: Deactivation Of Oral Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A broad spectrum of bacteria can be deactivated/destructed by NTAP, including Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Micrococcus luteus Yu et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010;Alkawareek et al 2014;Lunov et al 2015). It was found that NTAP's antibacterial activity was not due to UV emission (Lunov et al 2015) but rather to reactive oxygen species, which led to oxidative damages to cell membrane, DNA, and proteinaceous enzymes (Alkawareek et al 2014). Thus, the antibacterial efficacy of NTAP was tunable by adjusting oxygen feeding to the plasma-generating devices Yu et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010).…”
Section: Deactivation Of Oral Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%