2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2014.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma: Screening for gentle process conditions and antibacterial efficiency on perishable fresh produce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
43
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a research was conducted by Mai-Prochnow, Clauson, Hong, and Murphy (2016) to compare the sensitivity of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in resistance to cold plasma, and their results illustrated that grampositive bacteria, possessing relatively more stable and thicker cell wall, showed a slower initial reduction in CFU and higher resistance to cold plasma treatment as compared with gram-negative bacteria. However, Han, Patil, Keener, Cullen, and Bourke (2014) and Baier et al (2014) showed totally opposite results. Nevertheless, most studies showed that gram-negative bacteria were more plasma sensitive than gram-positive ones (Lunov et al, 2016;Yong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Microorganisms Decontaminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a research was conducted by Mai-Prochnow, Clauson, Hong, and Murphy (2016) to compare the sensitivity of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in resistance to cold plasma, and their results illustrated that grampositive bacteria, possessing relatively more stable and thicker cell wall, showed a slower initial reduction in CFU and higher resistance to cold plasma treatment as compared with gram-negative bacteria. However, Han, Patil, Keener, Cullen, and Bourke (2014) and Baier et al (2014) showed totally opposite results. Nevertheless, most studies showed that gram-negative bacteria were more plasma sensitive than gram-positive ones (Lunov et al, 2016;Yong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Microorganisms Decontaminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, Han, Patil, Keener, Cullen, and Bourke () and Baier et al. () showed totally opposite results. Nevertheless, most studies showed that gram‐negative bacteria were more plasma sensitive than gram‐positive ones (Lunov et al., ; Yong et al., ).…”
Section: Applications For Shelf Life Extensionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In recent years, the main objective of the plasma based research work is to ensure high microbial product safety and enzymatic stability by the application of CAPP under retaining the initial product quality (Fernández et al, 2013;Fröhling et al, 2012a;Hertwig et al;Pankaj et al, 2013;Surowsky et al, 2013). Thus, CAPP also qualifies as a new discipline in food processing and has been considered as an emerging nonthermal technology for the improvement of food safety since it is capable of effectively inactivating a wide range of microorganisms including spores and viruses (Baier et al, 2014;Birmingham, 2004;Surowsky et al, 2014;Terrier et al, 2009). For this purpose, CAPP has been applied for the decontamination of raw agricultural products, egg surface and real food systems and is proved to have specific potential for treatment of foods .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of reports on plasma treatment of plant surfaces is limited and different plasma sources were used in the studies (Grzegorzewski et al 2010). Typical biological applications of CAPP include the inactivation, and sterilization of microorganism and the bio-decontamination of surfaces (Foest et al 2006;Moreau et al 2008;Baier et al 2014). For reviews on technical applications, the reader is referred to Tendero et al (2006) and Morent et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%