2004
DOI: 10.1080/09670870410001655885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-target impact of chlorpyrifos on soil arthropods associated with no-tillage cornfields in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms controlling these distributions are variable and may include oviposition effects, responses to patterns in soil moisture, resource availability, texture, and chemistry, and responses to patterns in plant growth (Ettema and Wardle 2002). In this study, the insecticide we used likely reduced populations of all soil organisms, as chlorpyrifos applications generally result in reduced densities of earthworms (USDA 2001), Collembola (Frampton 1999, Pereira et al 2005, mites (Cabrera et al 2004, Pereira et al 2005; but see Michereff-Filho et al [2004] for contrasting results), and soil arthropods in general (Wang et al 2001, Dawson et al 2003, Pereira et al 2005; but see Clements et al [1988] for contrasting results for Carabidae). The effect of increasing microsite fertility on soil fauna is more difficult to predict.…”
Section: Implications For Carbon Cycling Belowgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms controlling these distributions are variable and may include oviposition effects, responses to patterns in soil moisture, resource availability, texture, and chemistry, and responses to patterns in plant growth (Ettema and Wardle 2002). In this study, the insecticide we used likely reduced populations of all soil organisms, as chlorpyrifos applications generally result in reduced densities of earthworms (USDA 2001), Collembola (Frampton 1999, Pereira et al 2005, mites (Cabrera et al 2004, Pereira et al 2005; but see Michereff-Filho et al [2004] for contrasting results), and soil arthropods in general (Wang et al 2001, Dawson et al 2003, Pereira et al 2005; but see Clements et al [1988] for contrasting results for Carabidae). The effect of increasing microsite fertility on soil fauna is more difficult to predict.…”
Section: Implications For Carbon Cycling Belowgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ant species have also been used to assess agroecosystem conditions. To the response of chlorpyrifos, the activity of the ant Solenopsis saevissima was lower 2 wk after spraying but recovered afterwards (Michereff et al, 2004). In a long-term analysis of non-target effects of microbial pesticide applications in forests, the ant species richness, diversity, abundance, and species composition did not change as a result of the treatments (Wang et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is also a growing concern of widespread contamination of the environment leading to potential risks to non-target organism because of its entry in the food chain (Aysal et al, 2004; Chandra et al, 2010; Muhammad et al, 2010) and undesirable health issues to humans that include developmental toxicity, liver damage, reproductive defects, endocrine disruptions, nervous system disorders, and immune system abnormalities (Furlong et al, 2006; Rauh et al, 2011; Terry, 2012; Alavanja et al, 2013). The acute toxicity of CP has also been reported in some animals including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, arthropods, and soil microorganisms (Michereff-Filho et al, 2004; Palma et al, 2008; Tuzmen et al, 2008; Dutta et al, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%