2020
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.592271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-syndromic Cleft Palate: An Overview on Human Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors

Abstract: The epithelial and mesenchymal cells involved in early embryonic facial development are guided by complex regulatory mechanisms. Any factor perturbing the growth, approach and fusion of the frontonasal and maxillary processes could result in orofacial clefts that represent the most common craniofacial malformations in humans. The rarest and, probably for this reason, the least studied form of cleft involves only the secondary palate, which is posterior to the incisive foramen. The etiology of cleft palate only… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, between the sixth and ninth week, the lateral palatal processes fuse after the secondary palate has been brought closer to the primary palate with a junction marked by the incisal foramen [ 10 ]. Multiple genetic (e.g., mutation on IRF6, MAFB, ABCA4 genes) and environmental factors (e.g., maternal smoking, maternal alcohol, nutritional factors, radiations) influence the growth, approach, and fusion of the fronto-nasal and maxillary processes [ 19 ]. These factors can lead to local changes in growth factors, extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell adhesion molecules to the point of causing a lack of fusion processes, leading to secondary cleft palate [ 20 ].…”
Section: Facial Cleftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, between the sixth and ninth week, the lateral palatal processes fuse after the secondary palate has been brought closer to the primary palate with a junction marked by the incisal foramen [ 10 ]. Multiple genetic (e.g., mutation on IRF6, MAFB, ABCA4 genes) and environmental factors (e.g., maternal smoking, maternal alcohol, nutritional factors, radiations) influence the growth, approach, and fusion of the fronto-nasal and maxillary processes [ 19 ]. These factors can lead to local changes in growth factors, extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell adhesion molecules to the point of causing a lack of fusion processes, leading to secondary cleft palate [ 20 ].…”
Section: Facial Cleftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Another evidence suggested that the causes of some congenital anomalies can be related to multifactorial origins [14][15][16] and environmental factors. 17,18 Because of these, investigating the underlining causes and risk factors of congenital anomalies may help to decrease the incidence of birth defects which is related to preventable risk factors of congenital anomalies and at present, vaccination, dietary intake of folate or iodine, preconception health care and ultrasound evaluation during pregnancy are available options for prevention of some form of birth defect. [19][20][21] Similar to developing countries, the prevalence of congenital anomalies in Ethiopia is also raising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors interact with each other to affect the strength and duration of key developmental signaling pathways, thereby increasing the possibility that they fail to achieve the thresholds required for normal patterning. The same is likely true of many common birth defects, including congenital heart defects, neural tube defects, and oro-facial clefting (Krauss and Hong, 2016;Beames and Lipinski, 2020;Martinelli et al, 2020;Finnell et al, 2021;Kodo et al, 2021). Genome sequencing analyses and epidemiology, plus mechanistic studies with animal models, have provided conceptual insights into HPE etiology which should prove applicable to these other developmental disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%