2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-019-09630-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-suicidal Self-Injuries and Adolescents High Risk Behaviours: Highlights from the Portuguese HBSC Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There can be various reasons why adolescents engage in fighting, such as self-defense, to gain or maintain respect, or anger, which can be addressed using various prevention strategies, including interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, that promote adolescent self-efficacy in using nonviolent strategies, and that address parental attitudes about fighting [ 34 ]. The effectiveness of such strategies and the search for other risk factors of this risk behavior should guide the future research in this largely neglected area of global health research [ 28 , 30 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be various reasons why adolescents engage in fighting, such as self-defense, to gain or maintain respect, or anger, which can be addressed using various prevention strategies, including interventions that teach anger management and conflict resolution, that promote adolescent self-efficacy in using nonviolent strategies, and that address parental attitudes about fighting [ 34 ]. The effectiveness of such strategies and the search for other risk factors of this risk behavior should guide the future research in this largely neglected area of global health research [ 28 , 30 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Participants were asked,‘Have you deliberately harmed or injured yourself without intending to end your own life during the past 12 months? Chen et al 2019 37 China 7129 (41.8%) 15.48 ± 1.65 Cluster sampling Self-report Self-report assessed using the Ottawa Self-injury Inventory(OSI) Five items from the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire Zhang et al 38 China 1366 (42.6%) 19.67 ± 4.92 Convenience sampling Self-report assessed using the Middle School Students Bullying Scale (MSSBS) Self-report assessed using the Adolescent,Self-injury Scale (ASS) Esposito et al 39 Italy 640 (60.5%) 15.60 ± 1.65 Convenience sampling Self-report Self-report Revised bully/victim questionnaire NSSI was assessed through a six-item scale measuring how frequently during the last 6 months, adolescents intentionally engaged in several types of self-injurious behaviors without suicidal intentions (such as cutting, burning, or hitting oneself) Gaspar et al 40 Portugal 3262 (54%) 14.8 ± 1.2 Random sampling from 36 national groups of public schools Self-report Self-report How many times have you taken part in bullying other student/ been bullied in the last 2 months? During the past 12 months, how many times have you hurt yourself on purpose?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these studies, children or adolescents who had experienced any form of bullying behaviour into a group were combined and compared them with children or adolescents who did not engage in bullying. All studies provide data on the NSSI risk of victims, ten studies 12 14 , 32 , 34 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 47 , 48 provide data on bullies, and six studies provide data on bully-victims 12 , 32 , 34 , 39 , 47 , 48 . Two researchers coded the included studies, including study location, sample size, age, sampling method, data collection method, and effect sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Portugal, NSSI prevalence in adolescence ranges from 20.3% to 34.5% (Carvalho et al, 2017;Gaspar et al, 2019;Gonçalves et al, 2012;Nobre-Lima et al, 2018), SI prevalence oscillates between 10.7% and 22% (Azevedo & Matos, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2017;Pereira & Cardoso, 2015), and about 7% of adolescents report having attempted suicide (Oliveira et al, 2001;Sampaio et al, 2000). These rates are identical to those found in international studies that focused on adolescents: 7.5-46.5% NSSI (Cipriano et al, 2017), 8.1-16.9% SI (Biswas et al, 2020;Georgiades et al, 2019;Sampasa-Kanyinga et al, 2017;Uddin et al, 2019), and 3-17% SAs (Georgiades et al, 2019;Sampasa-Kanyinga et al 2017;Uddin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%