2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.1298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐subsampled shearlet transform based MRI and PET brain image fusion using simplified pulse coupled neural network and weight local features in YIQ colour space

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) image fusion is a recent hybrid modality used in several oncology applications. The MRI image shows the brain tissue anatomy and does not contain any functional information, while the PET image indicates the brain function and has a low spatial resolution. A perfect MRI–PET fusion method preserves the functional information of the PET image and adds spatial characteristics of the MRI image with the less possible spatial distortion. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the first example applied to medical image fusion. Ouerghi et al [27] proposed a simplified pulse-coupled neural network (S-PCNN) based on NSST. Unlike other fusion methods, this method converts PET images into YIQ components.…”
Section: Pulse-coupled Neural Network (Pcnn) Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the first example applied to medical image fusion. Ouerghi et al [27] proposed a simplified pulse-coupled neural network (S-PCNN) based on NSST. Unlike other fusion methods, this method converts PET images into YIQ components.…”
Section: Pulse-coupled Neural Network (Pcnn) Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of validating the performance of our proposed method, the following five state-of-the-art methods are used to compare with our method: the IHS combined with retina-inspired models (IHS-Retina) method [5], the non-subsampled shearlet transform (NSST) method [10], the low-rank sparse dictionaries learning (LSDL) method [11], the nonparametric density model (NDM) method [14], and the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) method [22].…”
Section: ) Compared Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of approach usually generates a fused image which contains rich structural information with high resolution, but it generally distorts the color information of PET image due to the substitutive MRI image is rater different from the replaced I component of the PET image. The second type of method for merging PET and MRI images is implemented by the multi-resolution analysis (MRA) strategy [8]- [10]. This kind of method first decomposes PET and MRI images into multi-scale coefficients and transforming bases; then merges the decomposed coefficients according to a certain fusion rule; finally, inversely transforms the fused coefficients and transforming bases so as to get the final fused image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SD method allocates weights based on the variability of individual indicators, i.e., the relative moment characteristics, which is also often used in academia [64][65][66][67]. An indicator with the highest rate of absolute variability is evaluated as the most important, and its application is offered by the research of [68]. The MW method is the simplest in its process when the weight of all indicators is equal [69].…”
Section: Topsis From the View Of Indicator Importancementioning
confidence: 99%