2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2006.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-structural controllability of linear elastic systems with structural damping

Abstract: 13 pages, a4paper, no figures. Note added in proof: After our article was accepted for publication, we became aware of a paper to appear in Asymptotic Analysis: "Internal null-controllability for a structurally damped beam equation" by Julian Edward and Louis Tebou. This paper concerns (18) when $M$ is a segment and focuses on the limit $\rho\to 0$. We claim that our Theorem~2 generalizes the main result of this paper (n.b. $L_{\Omega}<\infty$ always hold when the dimension of $M$ is one). Since Theorem 1 of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge our article is the first one proving a Carleman estimate for the adjoint of the damped beam equation (1.1). The null controllability problem (1.1) without the potential term is already studied in the articles [23], [26] and [12] using spectral methods. Their technique is completely different from ours which is based in proving a Carleman estimate for the adjoint to the system (1.1).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of our knowledge our article is the first one proving a Carleman estimate for the adjoint of the damped beam equation (1.1). The null controllability problem (1.1) without the potential term is already studied in the articles [23], [26] and [12] using spectral methods. Their technique is completely different from ours which is based in proving a Carleman estimate for the adjoint to the system (1.1).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of both the articles [23] and [12] is based on proving an observability estimate by using Fourier decomposition and suitably using Bassel's inequality and Ingham-type inequalities for complex frequencies. In [26] the author explicitly obtains the cost of the control as T −→ 0, by tracking the constants in the observability estimate using spectral methods. The main focus of the present article is to derive a new Carleman estimate for the dual to the problem (1.1).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exact observability inequalities for the (magnetic) wave equation can transferred to observability inequalities for the (magnetic) Schrödinger equation and vice versa via a transmutation method (see Miller [33] and references therein) or by an abstract framework consisting in transforming a second order evolution equation into a first order evolution equation (see [37,Theorem 6.7.5 and Proposition 6.8.2] for more details).…”
Section: Define the Unbounded Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the frequency‐domain method, approximate controllability in finite time of the second‐order system is shown to be equivalent to the approximate controllability for the corresponding simplified first‐order system. In [20], controllability of the plate equation with square root damping and locally distributed control is investigated. Controllability condition is derived using duality principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%