2019
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/28/8/084701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Stokes drag coefficient in single-particle electrophoresis: New insights on a classical problem

Abstract: We measured the intrinsic electrophoretic drag coefficient of a single charged particle by optically trapping the particle and applying an AC electric field, and found it to be markedly different from that of the Stokes drag. The drag coefficient, along with the measured electrical force, yield a mobility-zeta potential relation that agrees with the literature. By using the measured mobility as input, numerical calculations based on the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations, coupled to the Navier-Stokes equation, re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the drag evaluated at the inner/outer interface indeed agrees reasonably well with the measured value, on the order of two times the Stokes drag [19]. The measured value displayed a variation with the liquid pH value.…”
Section: The Relevant Surface At Which the Hydrodynamic Drag Should B...supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of the drag evaluated at the inner/outer interface indeed agrees reasonably well with the measured value, on the order of two times the Stokes drag [19]. The measured value displayed a variation with the liquid pH value.…”
Section: The Relevant Surface At Which the Hydrodynamic Drag Should B...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Experimentally, the problem of measuring the drag force was solved by using an optical tweezer to hold a single silica particle and applying an AC electric field [19]. Since the optical tweezer represents a harmonic potential trap for the held particle, the particle displacement from the center of the trap yields the force as that of a spring.…”
Section: The Force Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using traditional DC measurements to determine the crossover frequency is difficult because the Brownian motion often swamps measurements of the null phoretic motion near the crossover frequency [23]. It is impossible to determine the drag coefficient of any phoretic motion by DC measurements, because the phoretic motion, absent of acceleration, is subject to zero net force, as the drag force perfectly opposes the phoretic force [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, possible to determine the drag coefficient by an AC measurement from the phase delay of the particle's phoretic motion relative to that of the harmonically varying electrophoretic force, as demonstrated in earlier work [24]. We have used such a detection method to measure the crossover frequency and phoretic force of dielectrophoresis with high precision [23,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser is highly focused by an oil-immersion microscope objective lens (Olympus, PlanFluo, 100X, numerical aperture = 1.3) to trap a 1 μm polystyrene particle (Thermo Fisher Scientific #4009A). A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in our previous published papers [43][44][45] . Movements of the trapped particle, tracked by the other IR laser beam (0.5 mW, wavelength = 980 nm, Thorlabs, Inc.), are detected by a quadrant photodiode (QPD, Hamamatsu #S7479).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%