1962
DOI: 10.1039/tf9625802239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-stoichiometric clathrate compounds of water. Part 2.—Formation and properties of double hydrates

Abstract: An investigation has been made of type I1 double hydrates, involving organic species such as chloroform with Hz, Ne, N2, Ar, 0 2 , C&, Kr, Xe, C2H4, CzH6 and C02 as "help" gases. Among these, the heavier rare gases and methane showed considerable selectivity i n their affinity for the small cavities of the host lattice. All phases were non-stoichiometric in composition : the average fraction of the larger cavities of the host lattice occupied by the main hydrate formers CHC13 and CH31 were respectively 0.95 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data confirm previous studies by Barrer and Ruzicka (1962), Barrer and Edge (1967) and Chersky and Tsarev (1999) demonstrating encapsulation of N 2 , O 2 , Ar, Kr and Xe and exclusion of He in gas hydrates. In contrast to Barrer and Ruzicka (1962) and Barrer and Edge (1967) A rough mass balance calculation from the initial gas pressure of 20 MPa (pressure at the time of sampling the initial headspace gas) down to a final pressure 17 MPa (post hydrate formation), at uniform temperature (254°K) and variable volume (0.9 to 0.759 to account for volume decrease with hydrate formation) yields a total loss of 2.4 mol of gas from the synthesis chamber to 120 g of water in the hydrate structure. In terms of mass balance of the gases with observed decreases (N 2 , O 2 , 20 Ne, 36,40 Ar, 84 Kr and 132 Xe) in mole fraction from initial to final headspace composition, all indicate loss (molar decrease) in the headspace; however, despite the noted increase in mole fraction of CH 4 , there is still a net loss of CH 4 from the headspace.…”
Section: Initial Vs Final Headspace Compositionssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These data confirm previous studies by Barrer and Ruzicka (1962), Barrer and Edge (1967) and Chersky and Tsarev (1999) demonstrating encapsulation of N 2 , O 2 , Ar, Kr and Xe and exclusion of He in gas hydrates. In contrast to Barrer and Ruzicka (1962) and Barrer and Edge (1967) A rough mass balance calculation from the initial gas pressure of 20 MPa (pressure at the time of sampling the initial headspace gas) down to a final pressure 17 MPa (post hydrate formation), at uniform temperature (254°K) and variable volume (0.9 to 0.759 to account for volume decrease with hydrate formation) yields a total loss of 2.4 mol of gas from the synthesis chamber to 120 g of water in the hydrate structure. In terms of mass balance of the gases with observed decreases (N 2 , O 2 , 20 Ne, 36,40 Ar, 84 Kr and 132 Xe) in mole fraction from initial to final headspace composition, all indicate loss (molar decrease) in the headspace; however, despite the noted increase in mole fraction of CH 4 , there is still a net loss of CH 4 from the headspace.…”
Section: Initial Vs Final Headspace Compositionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…3). According to Barrer and Ruzicka (1962) and Barrer and Edge (1967), Ar, Kr, and Xe components are released from lattice sites of the methane hydrate, but He and Ne have small enough effective ionic radii that they should be absent. In our experiment, however, the concentrations of He and Ne are low, but not absent (Table 1), and the mass balance (Section 4.1) indicates that 20 Ne should be partially retained while 4 He should be low to absent.…”
Section: Gas Release Patterns From the Step Dissociation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clathrate data points with arrows indicate faulting behavior. (6). Stressstrain curves of deformed methane clathrate (run 368) showing systematic strain hardening, compared with the sharp yielding, strain softening, and steady-state flow of "standard" polyctystalline H, O ice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%