2008 International Conference on Radar 2008
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2008.4653986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-stationary sea clutter: Impact on disturbance covariance matrix estimate and detector CFAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from further bistatic angles are required to develop a full understanding of the variation in the statistics of the backscattered signals. It would also be of interest to apply the methods seen in [4] to the comparative bistatic/monostatic spectrograms to gain a deeper understanding of the nonstationary effects within bistatic sea clutter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from further bistatic angles are required to develop a full understanding of the variation in the statistics of the backscattered signals. It would also be of interest to apply the methods seen in [4] to the comparative bistatic/monostatic spectrograms to gain a deeper understanding of the nonstationary effects within bistatic sea clutter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of working with low values of N is to ensure the temporal stationarity of the clutter. In fact, previous analysis of recorded real sea clutter data [27,28], showed that this process is non-stationary, both in time and space. In addition, the aforementioned figures show that the knowledge of the fraction of the cells under test containing the target, is very important (see Table 1).…”
Section: Performance In Terms Of Detection Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with this uncertainty, the random clutter texture component is treated as a deterministic and unknown parameter. The first candidate for the independent model is the normalized sample covariance matrix (NSCM) estimator [26,33]. Here, we normalize each term {x k (n)x H k (n)} in the sums in (24) by the data-dependent normalization factorτ k NSCM in place of true τ k to obtain…”
Section: Adaptive Cg-pglrt Detector For Unknown Ar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%