2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1816383116000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-State actors’ pursuit of CBRN weapons: From motivation to potential humanitarian consequences

Abstract: This paper discusses non-State actors’ motivation and capacity to develop and use chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) improvised weapons in attacks, as well as the possible consequences of such use. Six types of groups have been identified as potential CBRN weapons users that may increasingly be able to acquire relevant CBRN weapons-related knowledge, skills and possibly materials. As technical barriers still form a gap between the theoretical possibility and the operational reality, any poten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Bunn and Wier (2006) argued that 'the danger [of a nuclear terrorist attack] should not be exaggerated' (see also Lustick, 2006;Mueller, 2006). Nevertheless, after including such a caveat, most researchers tended to emphasise that, although the likelihood of a CBRN terrorist attack remained low, it had increased since the 1990s '[due] to globalization, which facilitates the spread of knowledge, capabilities and materials' (Meulenbelt and Nieuwenhuizen, 2015) and that an attack of that type could have extremely severe consequences (Laqueur, 1999;Stern, 1999;Combs, 2018).…”
Section: In the Shadow Of Al Qaedamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Bunn and Wier (2006) argued that 'the danger [of a nuclear terrorist attack] should not be exaggerated' (see also Lustick, 2006;Mueller, 2006). Nevertheless, after including such a caveat, most researchers tended to emphasise that, although the likelihood of a CBRN terrorist attack remained low, it had increased since the 1990s '[due] to globalization, which facilitates the spread of knowledge, capabilities and materials' (Meulenbelt and Nieuwenhuizen, 2015) and that an attack of that type could have extremely severe consequences (Laqueur, 1999;Stern, 1999;Combs, 2018).…”
Section: In the Shadow Of Al Qaedamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the methods used by these non-state actors to inflict harm to date are conventional, there have been instances in the past where non-conventional CBRNE warfare was used on the susceptible population. [ 5 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instances of CBRNE attacks are well documented in the 1995 sarin attack in the Tokyo subway, the 2001 anthrax letters in the US letters where anthrax spores were sent to several news agencies and two US senators, causing the deaths of five people, and recently in 2015, Syria, whereof rebels made low-grade on, used chemical weapons like chlorine and mustard gas against Kurdish fighters on several occasions. [ 5 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood of major incidents and disasters has increased in recent years. Climate change has increased the risk of natural disasters occurring; urbanisation has increased the potential for populations to be exposed to technological disasters; and in war and terrorism, there is an increased willingness of state and non-state actors to use unconventional weapons (Mazzone, 2013;Meulenbelt & Nieuwenhuizen, 2015;North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%