Proceedings of the XXVI International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE 2008) 2009
DOI: 10.22323/1.066.0282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Standard Physics in Leptonic Decays

Abstract: Recent measurements of the branching fraction for D s → ν disagree with the Standard Model expectation, which relies on calculations of f D s from lattice QCD. This paper uses recent preliminary measurements from CLEO and a new preliminary lattice-QCD result from this conference to update the significance of the discrepancy. The " f D s puzzle" stands now at 3.5σ , with σ predominantly from the statistical uncertainty of the experiments. New physics scenarios that could solve the puzzle would also lead to non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, the c → s ν transitions attracted a lot of interest from the point of view of searches for NP, after the disagreement between the lattice evaluations of the decay constant f Ds and experimental extractions thereof at the level of around 4σ. Several different NP scenarios were considered as explanations of that puzzle [15][16][17]. Current agreements between the experimental results and the lattice evaluations offer an opportunity for a derivation of tight constraints on the NP effects in these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, the c → s ν transitions attracted a lot of interest from the point of view of searches for NP, after the disagreement between the lattice evaluations of the decay constant f Ds and experimental extractions thereof at the level of around 4σ. Several different NP scenarios were considered as explanations of that puzzle [15][16][17]. Current agreements between the experimental results and the lattice evaluations offer an opportunity for a derivation of tight constraints on the NP effects in these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, only a couple of analysis has been done using the Semileptonic and leptonic decays of the D mesons [5,6,7]. In particular, in [5], the lattice calculations of f Ds implied a 3.8σ deviation of the SM prediction over the experimental value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy was alleviated once the form factors were re-evaluated and now it is known with a high level of precision (around 2% error) [9]. In [6] it was suggested the possibility of doing a combined analysis of the semileptonic and leptonic decays of the D mesons but the analysis was not performed. Such analysis was recently done [7] as suggested in [6] now including the updated values of both the semileptonic form factors [3] and leptonic decay constant f Ds [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non Standard interactions from a model independent approach had been considered and constrained with D s leptonic decays [19,20], and independently, using semileptonic decays [20,21]. In this work we make a model independent analysis and a model dependent analysis in order to constrain NSIs combining the leptonic and semileptonic decays of the D meson.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%