2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-specific physical symptoms and electromagnetic field exposure in the general population: Can we get more specific? A systematic review

Abstract: This systematic review and meta-analysis finds no evidence for a direct association between frequency and severity of NSPS and higher levels of EMF exposure. An association with perceived exposure seems to exist, but evidence is still limited because of differences in conceptualization and assessment methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such concerns are often justified, considering the well-documented harmful effects of a number of pollutants [3][4][5]. Nevertheless, people's worries about a given source can also be in conflict with what research evidence suggests, as in the case of attribution of non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) to everyday life electromagnetic fields (EMF) [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such concerns are often justified, considering the well-documented harmful effects of a number of pollutants [3][4][5]. Nevertheless, people's worries about a given source can also be in conflict with what research evidence suggests, as in the case of attribution of non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) to everyday life electromagnetic fields (EMF) [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is thought a nocebo effect may play a role in the formation of other apparent side effects (Barsky, Saintfort, Rogers, & Borus, 2002). As well as medication side effects, nocebo effects have been implicated in symptoms attributed to technological exposures such as electro-magnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phones and Wi-Fi (Baliatsas et al, 2012; Rubin, Cleare, & Wessely, 2008). A nocebo effect is the experience of negative symptoms following exposure to an inert substance, which are triggered or exacerbated by psychological mechanisms such as expectations (Kennedy, 1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews have concluded that a causal relationship between subjective health complaints and non-occupational exposure to RF-EMF cannot be adequately and consistently supported, either in experimental or in observational studies (Augner et al, 2012;Baliatsas et al, 2012;R€ o€ osli et al, 2010;Rubin et al, 2010). Only three studies in the past 20 years have investigated the association of NSPS and exposure to ELF MF for women, suggesting associations with subjective complaints (McMahan and Meyer, 1995) and self-reported sleep quality (Li et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is the case for both extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MF) and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF). In some cases this worry appears related to non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) such as fatigue, headache, dizziness, sleep problems, heart palpitations and skin problems (Baliatsas et al, 2012;Schreier et al, 2006;WHO, 2005). However, it is less clear whether also the actual exposure to EMF is associated with NSPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%