1996
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-solar ultraviolet radiation and the risk of basal and squamous cell skin cancer

Abstract: Smumary A case -control study of non-melanocytic skin cancer was conducted among men in the province of Alberta, Canada Two hundred and twenty-six cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 180 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 406 age-matched controls provided information concerning skin pigmentation, occupational history, recreational activity, exposure to sunlight and sources of non-solar ultraviolet radiation (NSUVR) and other potential risk factors. Our analyses show no evidence of elevated risk for BC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two hospital-based case-control studies in Ireland, in the mid to late 1980s, did not show any relationship between the use of tanning devices and non-melanoma skin cancer (O'Loughlin et al, 1985;Herity et al, 1989). A similar conclusion, at about the same time, was reached by Bajdik et al (1996) in British Columbia, Canada, who evaluated 406 controls (population based) against 180 SCC cases and 226 BCC cases. About 10% of each group had "ever" used a sunlamp.…”
Section: Chronic Skin Cancersupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Two hospital-based case-control studies in Ireland, in the mid to late 1980s, did not show any relationship between the use of tanning devices and non-melanoma skin cancer (O'Loughlin et al, 1985;Herity et al, 1989). A similar conclusion, at about the same time, was reached by Bajdik et al (1996) in British Columbia, Canada, who evaluated 406 controls (population based) against 180 SCC cases and 226 BCC cases. About 10% of each group had "ever" used a sunlamp.…”
Section: Chronic Skin Cancersupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Similar results have been reported in the only published article dealing with this issue. 20 Paradoxically, we found a significant "protective" effect for the exposure to fluorescent lighting at the workplace. A likely explanation for this finding is that occupational exposure to fluorescent light implies an indoor workplace and an associated reduction in sun exposure.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A possible limitation would be confounding factors such as natural sunlight exposure, since individuals who seek artificial tanning also expose themselves to the sun for the same purpose, as well as the long latency period between exposure and onset of cancer. 66.184 Some studies did not find evidence of risk of nonmelanoma tumors, 185 whereas others have associated the habit of artificial tanning with BCC (OR = 1.5) and SCC (OR = 2.5), even when adjusted for sunburns , sunbathing and sun exposure. 43.186-188 There is also a strong association with melanoma, even though a relationship between dose and response is not quantified.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%