2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-serious answers to (improper) questions in talk shows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TV interviews have been studied from the im/politeness, language, and ideological perspectives, such as how im/politeness models and strategies are used ( Culpeper, 2005 ; Cook, 2014 ; Fedyna, 2016 ; Rabab’Ah et al, 2019 ; Damayanti and Mubarak, 2021 ; Sitorus et al, 2022 ) linguistic features ( Ilie, 2001 ), the representation of ideologies and power relations ( Bilal et al, 2012 ; Sharifi et al, 2017 ), the host’s role in managing discourse ( Oyeleye and Olutayo, 2012 ), structural units ( Kamil Ali, 2018 ), and guests’ non-serious responses ( Sheikhan and Haugh, 2022 ), to name but a few. However, as previously stated, few studies have focused specifically on DMs in the context of TV interviews.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TV interviews have been studied from the im/politeness, language, and ideological perspectives, such as how im/politeness models and strategies are used ( Culpeper, 2005 ; Cook, 2014 ; Fedyna, 2016 ; Rabab’Ah et al, 2019 ; Damayanti and Mubarak, 2021 ; Sitorus et al, 2022 ) linguistic features ( Ilie, 2001 ), the representation of ideologies and power relations ( Bilal et al, 2012 ; Sharifi et al, 2017 ), the host’s role in managing discourse ( Oyeleye and Olutayo, 2012 ), structural units ( Kamil Ali, 2018 ), and guests’ non-serious responses ( Sheikhan and Haugh, 2022 ), to name but a few. However, as previously stated, few studies have focused specifically on DMs in the context of TV interviews.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%