2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0623-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-reversible tissue fixation retains extracellular vesicles for in situ imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this discrepancy is not known, but renal epithelial cells are, however, highly water permeable 38 , and we speculate that rapid osmotic changes (e.g., 25% sucrose) imposed during tissue preparation are involved. Recently, it was shown that the handling and preparation of tissue samples significantly affect tissue EV abundance through release to, e.g., washing buffers 39 . Our observations agree with this and suggest that careful and specific tissue preparation is essential when analyzing tissue EV levels and intercellular communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this discrepancy is not known, but renal epithelial cells are, however, highly water permeable 38 , and we speculate that rapid osmotic changes (e.g., 25% sucrose) imposed during tissue preparation are involved. Recently, it was shown that the handling and preparation of tissue samples significantly affect tissue EV abundance through release to, e.g., washing buffers 39 . Our observations agree with this and suggest that careful and specific tissue preparation is essential when analyzing tissue EV levels and intercellular communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That can be accomplished using different methodologies, allowing to determine size, shape, concentration, contents, and surface biochemical-markers. They include: (i) western blotting; (ii) identification and quantification of nucleic-acid contents, using polymerase chain-reaction (PCR), microarray and secondgeneration sequencing (SGS) and third-generation sequencing (TGS), sometimes known with the ambiguous name of "next"generation sequencing (NGS); (iii) lipidomic approaches; (iv) nanoparticle-tracking analyses (NTA) or (v) tunable-resistive pulse sensing (TRPS), both for determination of the size and concentration of particles; (vi) dynamic-light scattering (DLS) or (vii) photon-correlation spectroscopy (PCS), both to measure exosome sizes; (viii) atomic-force microscopy (AFM) or (ix) transmission electron microscopy (TEM), both for visualization and characterization of their structure, morphology, and size; (x) flow cytometry, for the characterization of surface biochemical markers; and (xi) fixation for in situ imaging (Choi et al, 2013;Kreimer et al, 2015;Gupta et al, 2019;Gurunathan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was shown that the handling and preparation of tissue samples significantly affect tissue EV abundance through release to e.g. washing buffers 25 . Our observations agree with this and suggest that careful and specific tissue preparation is important when analyzing tissue EV levels and intercellular communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%