2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-remote reference noise cancellation - using reference data in the presence of surface-NMR signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active and post processing cancellation approaches to EMI mitigation that are more flexible and are less intrusive to the subject have been developed for Magnetotellurics, [20][21][22] transient electromagnetics, 23 SQUID MRI, 24 surface NMR instrumentation, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ECG, 33 EEG 34 and MRI. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Large "figure 8"-shaped surface coils have also been used to cancel EMI actively 26,31 for surface NMR groundwater surveys, but this method is not easily translated to in vivo brain imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active and post processing cancellation approaches to EMI mitigation that are more flexible and are less intrusive to the subject have been developed for Magnetotellurics, [20][21][22] transient electromagnetics, 23 SQUID MRI, 24 surface NMR instrumentation, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ECG, 33 EEG 34 and MRI. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Large "figure 8"-shaped surface coils have also been used to cancel EMI actively 26,31 for surface NMR groundwater surveys, but this method is not easily translated to in vivo brain imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard surface NMR experiment repeats the measurement multiple times for different excitation pulses. The subsequent signal processing workflow typically includes most or all of these steps: detection and culling of impulsive noise, that is, despiking , modelling and subtraction of powerline harmonic noise (Larsen et al 2014;Larsen & Behroozmand 2016), remote reference noise cancellation (Müller-Petke & Spectral analysis of surface NMR data 287 Müller-Petke 2020), stacking (Jiang et al 2011), digital filtering and synchronous envelope detection (Legchenko & Valla 1998;Müller-Petke et al 2016). Ideally, the signal processing results in high signal-to-noise ratio data from which the NMR signal amplitude, relaxation time and phase can be determined (Roy & Lubczynski 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%