2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c10801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Relativistic Electronic-Structure Computation of Neutral and Cationic Systems [Fr2, Fr–AEM+ (AEM= Ca, Sr, Ba)]

Abstract: The experimental field of ultracold ion-atom mixtures including an alkali-metal atom and an alkaline-earthmetal ion as well as of homonuclear alkali dimers has paved the way for creating and manipulating the ultracold molecules. The present paper is focused on a study of molecules such us francium dimer and a comparative spectroscopic investigation of the cationic systems Fr−(Ca + , Sr + , Ba + ). We adopt a computational scheme without spin−orbit coupling reposed on the full configuration interaction and semi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that, for 1,3 Π and 1,3 Δ symmetries, the spectroscopic constants are investigated for the first time. As reported in table 3, the well depths and equilibrium distances for the ground and the first excited states of CaFr + , agree well with those of reference [48] as the largest differences ΔR e and ΔD e are 0.68 bohr and 132 cm −1 , respectively, for 4 1 Σ + and 5 1 Σ + excited states. In the case of SrFr + , our presented results and those of [48] are in good agreement.…”
Section: Presentation and Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We note that, for 1,3 Π and 1,3 Δ symmetries, the spectroscopic constants are investigated for the first time. As reported in table 3, the well depths and equilibrium distances for the ground and the first excited states of CaFr + , agree well with those of reference [48] as the largest differences ΔR e and ΔD e are 0.68 bohr and 132 cm −1 , respectively, for 4 1 Σ + and 5 1 Σ + excited states. In the case of SrFr + , our presented results and those of [48] are in good agreement.…”
Section: Presentation and Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As reported in table 3, the well depths and equilibrium distances for the ground and the first excited states of CaFr + , agree well with those of reference [48] as the largest differences ΔR e and ΔD e are 0.68 bohr and 132 cm −1 , respectively, for 4 1 Σ + and 5 1 Σ + excited states. In the case of SrFr + , our presented results and those of [48] are in good agreement. Where the largest ΔR e (0.24 bohr) is noted for the 2nd minimum of the second electronic excited state 3 1 Σ + , while the well depths seems to be slightly over-estimated in calculations presented in [48], as they employed different basis set.…”
Section: Presentation and Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations