2011
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-relativistic and relativistic scattering by short-range potentials

Abstract: Relativistic and non-relativistic scattering by short-range potentials is investigated for selected problems. Scattering by the d potential in the Schrödinger equation and d potentials in the Dirac equation must be solved by regularization, efficiently carried out by a perturbation technique involving a stretched variable. Asymmetric regularizations yield non-unique scattering coefficients. Resonant penetration through the potentials is found. Approximative Schrödinger equations in the non-relativistic limit a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for τ > 2 (at the line L 0 ) the divergent terms in (28) and (30) vanish at all at the same resonance conditions (47). Next, from expressions (27) and (29) we conclude that the limit Λ-matrix is of form (8) with the element θ defined by formulae (50). Similarly, this family of point interactions may be called 'resonant-tunnelling δ ′potentials of the J -type'.…”
Section: Splitting Of Resonance Sets At the Critical Point µ =mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, for τ > 2 (at the line L 0 ) the divergent terms in (28) and (30) vanish at all at the same resonance conditions (47). Next, from expressions (27) and (29) we conclude that the limit Λ-matrix is of form (8) with the element θ defined by formulae (50). Similarly, this family of point interactions may be called 'resonant-tunnelling δ ′potentials of the J -type'.…”
Section: Splitting Of Resonance Sets At the Critical Point µ =mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Equation (9) is a direct consequence of requirements (i) and (ii) and the solution of the distributional Schrödinger equation with the general interaction (5). This alone, however, does not impose any constraints on the form of M ± (i.e., on the functionals α 0 and α 1 ); such constraints will come from imposing, in addition to (i) and (ii), condition (iii).…”
Section: Schrödinger's Equation With Point Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point (zero-range) interactions have attracted great interest in quantum mechanics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. They provide important solvable models with a wide variety of applications in atomic physics, such as the Lieb-Liniger [8,9] model for a one dimensional gas of bosons interacting by means of a δ-function potential (for other applications see, e.g., [10,11,12] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have also been controversies in the literature due to conflicting regularizationdependent results obtained in the treatment of the so-called δ ′ -interaction [30][31][32][33]. These controversies, however, were clarified by using mathematically rigorous methods such as selfadjoint extensions (SAE) [34][35][36][37] and Schwartz's distribution theory [38,39] (there are also alternative approaches using non-standard distribution theory, e.g., [40,41]), both of which unequivocally demonstrate the existence of a four-parameter family of point interactions in one dimensional quantum mechanics-these include, but are not restricted to, the δ interaction as well as other interactions commonly associated with the δ ′ in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%