2021
DOI: 10.3390/genes12010081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Redundant tRNA Reference Sequences for Deep Sequencing Analysis of tRNA Abundance and Epitranscriptomic RNA Modifications

Abstract: Analysis of RNA by deep-sequencing approaches has found widespread application in modern biology. In addition to measurements of RNA abundance under various physiological conditions, such techniques are now widely used for mapping and quantification of RNA modifications. Transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules are among the frequent targets of such investigation, since they contain multiple modified residues. However, the major challenge in tRNA examination is related to a large number of duplicated and point-mutated ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our previous investigations assessed the overall modification content of tRNA fraction and small RNA fragments by LC-MS [23] , we here chose a more sophisticated approach, namely pinpointing the location of tRNA modifications by RNA-seq based methods specifically tailored to mapping of (i) m 5 C residues by bisulfite sequencing [27] , (ii) ribose-methylated nucleotides Nm by RiboMethSeq [33] , and (iii) alkali-sensitive modifications D, m 3 C, and m 7 G, by AlkAnilineSeq [30] . In all three methods, reads were aligned to a synthetic “tRNA genome”, the tRNA reference sequences specifically designed for this type of analysis [32] . This reduced tRNA genome accounts for the occurrence of 39 cytoplasmic tRNA sequence families, each one consolidating sequences of high similarity, such as isoacceptors/isodecoders that differ only by a few SNPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While our previous investigations assessed the overall modification content of tRNA fraction and small RNA fragments by LC-MS [23] , we here chose a more sophisticated approach, namely pinpointing the location of tRNA modifications by RNA-seq based methods specifically tailored to mapping of (i) m 5 C residues by bisulfite sequencing [27] , (ii) ribose-methylated nucleotides Nm by RiboMethSeq [33] , and (iii) alkali-sensitive modifications D, m 3 C, and m 7 G, by AlkAnilineSeq [30] . In all three methods, reads were aligned to a synthetic “tRNA genome”, the tRNA reference sequences specifically designed for this type of analysis [32] . This reduced tRNA genome accounts for the occurrence of 39 cytoplasmic tRNA sequence families, each one consolidating sequences of high similarity, such as isoacceptors/isodecoders that differ only by a few SNPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction of reduced tRNA reference dataset for alignment was described previously [32] . In brief, predicted tRNA genes from gtRNAdb database (http://gtrnadb.ucsc.edu/) were clustered based on Euclidean distance between tRNA sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of human tRNA 2′-O-methylation by RiboMethSeq was performed using the optimized non-redundant collection of reference tRNA sequences. This reduced collection contains 43 tRNA species and was validated by analysis of several experimentally obtained RiboMethSeq datasets ( Pichot et al, 2021 ). Alignment of RiboMethSeq reads obtained in this study also confirmed low content in ambiguously mapped reads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of human tRNA 2’-O-methylation by RiboMethSeq was performed using the optimised non-redundant collection of reference tRNA sequences. This reduced collection contains 43 tRNA species and was validated by analysis of several experimentally obtained RiboMethSeq sequencing datasets (Pichot et al , 2021). Alignment of RiboMethSeq reads obtained in this study also confirmed low content in ambiguously mapped reads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%