1969
DOI: 10.1038/2221277a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-random X-Inactivation in the Female Mule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The female mule pattern represented a combination of the two parental types. This observation of multiple bands resembles the previous findings of others with starch gel electrophoresis (20)(21)(22). In artificial mixtures of horse and donkey erythrocyte lysates, as well as in female mule erythrocytes, the minor (slower) donkey band was coincident with the major (faster) horse band.…”
Section: Biochemical Determinationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The female mule pattern represented a combination of the two parental types. This observation of multiple bands resembles the previous findings of others with starch gel electrophoresis (20)(21)(22). In artificial mixtures of horse and donkey erythrocyte lysates, as well as in female mule erythrocytes, the minor (slower) donkey band was coincident with the major (faster) horse band.…”
Section: Biochemical Determinationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…female mule (22, 23). By autoradiography, Hamerton et al (22) found that the donkey X-chromosome was late-replicating in approximately 90% of the cells of three female mules. In two of the animals, both skin fibroblasts and leukocytes were studied and considerable agreement was observed between the two tissues.…”
Section: Biochemical Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1964, Mukherjee and Sinha (1964) found cytological evidence for random X inactivation in leukocytes of a single female mule, supporting the Lyon hypothesis. In 1969, Hamerton et al (1969Hamerton et al ( , 1971 reported nonrandom X inactivation in female mules, suggesting that the X inactivation might be aberrant in mules. However, subsequent studies revealed that this could be due to selection during cell culture and/or the sampling effect of random X inactivation (Mukherjee and Mukherjee 1970;Mukherjee and Milet 1972;Serov et al 1978).…”
Section: [Supplemental Materials Is Available For This Article]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an analogy could perhaps be drawn between the suppression of nucleolar function in species hybrids and the inactivation of one, or part of one, of the X chromosomes in mammals (Lyon, 1961(Lyon, , 1962. Although normally random inactivation of the paternal or maternal X occurs in man and mouse, Hamerton et al (1969) showed that in the female mule (horse x donkey), the paternal X preferentially shows late labelling and is presumably also preferentially inactivated, since the product of the paternally derived glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase allele, which is X-linked, is only weakly represented. This makes the parallel between behaviour of sex and of nucleolar chromosomes even closer: consistent inactivation of the same (or part of the same) X chromosome in a female hybrid mammal and of the same parental nucleolar organiser in some plant hybrids; the presence of a differential segment in sex chromosomes and of a condensed satellite thread in plant hybrids; and dosage compensation in certain X-linked genes (data summarised by Thompson, 1965) and sometimes in production of nucleolar material (McClintock, 1934;Beerman, 1960;Longwell and Svihla, 1960;Brown and Gurdon, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%