1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00652.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐puerperal lactation associated with antidepressant drug use

Abstract: AimsThe aim of the present study was to estimate the relative risk of non-puerperal lactation in patients using antidepressants in general, and specifically for serotonergic (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and clomipramine) and nonserotonergic antidepressants. Methods All suspected adverse drug reactions in women and reported from January 1986 until August 1996 to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Foundation, a spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting programme, were analysed. Adverse drug … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ROR of haloperidol in comparison with the ROR of cardiac ADRs of olanzapine and quetiapine was calculated as previously described [14,15].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Who Adverse Drug Reaction Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROR of haloperidol in comparison with the ROR of cardiac ADRs of olanzapine and quetiapine was calculated as previously described [14,15].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Who Adverse Drug Reaction Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in the present case, prolactin levels were within the normal range. The authors could find only two such cases (7,8). In the present report, galactorrhoea was seen at a …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…These ratios were defined as the ratio of the exposure odds of reported cases of anaphylaxis to the exposure odds of other adverse events and were first calculated by comparison of index groups with the reference group [17,19]. The RORs were calculated as (a/c)/(b/d) ( Table 1) and expressed as point estimates with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%