Non-porous membrane-assisted liquid–liquid extraction of UV filter compounds from water samples

Rodil, Rosario; Schrader, Steffi; Moeder, Monika

doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.04.042

Cited by 112 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, current trends focus on miniaturization by using microextraction techniques, which consume less toxic organic solvent than the above-mentioned traditional ones (or even avoid them). Thus, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [10], stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [11][12][13], single-drop microextraction (SDME) [14,15], membrane-assisted liquid-liquid extraction (MALLE) [16], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [17,18] and cloud point extraction (CPE) [19] have been proposed as microextraction techniques for UVfilter determination in environmental water samples.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dispersive solid-phase extraction based on oleic acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for UV-filter determination in water samples

Román

Chisvert

Canals

2011

Journal of Chromatography A

168

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dispersive solid-phase extraction based on oleic acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for UV-filter determination in water samples

Román

Chisvert

Canals

2011

Journal of Chromatography A

168

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other less conventional methodologies were also applied to water samples in order to extract the organic compounds, like ionic liquid based ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction (IL-USAEME) (Ge and Lee, 2012) with around 100% recovery, ionic liquid-based single-drop microextraction (IL-SDME) (Vidal et al, 2010) with average recovery of 100%, non-porous membrane-assisted liquid-liquid extraction (MALLE) (Rodil et al, 2009b) yielding 60 to 100% recovery, magnetic nanoparticles dispersive solid-phase extraction (MNPs-based dSPE) (Román et al, 2011) with about 70-125% recovery, microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) (Moeder et al, 2010) with 60 to 115% and micelle mediated extraction (MME) (Giokas et al, 2005) with average recoveries of 100%. These techniques are relatively new and their applicability to extract UV-filters from water samples has been poorly investigated.…”

Section: Dllme Is a Liquid-liquid Extraction (Lle) Based On The Relamentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in analytical methods and occurrence of organic UV-filters in the environment — A review

Ramos

Homem

Alves

et al. 2015

Science of The Total Environment

263

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

UV-filters are a group of compounds designed mainly to protect skin against UVA and UVB radiation, but they are also included in plastics, furniture, etc., to protect products from light damage. Their massive use in sunscreens for skin protection has been increasing due to the awareness of the chronic and acute effects of UV radiation. Some organic UV-filters have raised significant concerns in the past few years for their continuous usage, persistent input and potential threat to ecological environment and human health. UV-filters end up is wastewater and because wastewater treatment plants are not efficient in removing them, lipophilic compounds tend to sorb onto sludge and hydrophilics end up in river water, contaminating the existing biota. To better understand the risk associated with UV-filters in the environment a thorough review regarding their physicochemical properties, toxicity and environmental degradation, analytical methods and their occurrence was conducted.Higher UV-filter concentrations were found in rivers, reaching 0.3 mg/L for the most studied family, the benzophenone derivatives. Concentrations in the ng to µg/L range were also detected for the paminobenzoic acid, cinnamate, crylene and benzoyl methane derivatives in lake and sea water.Although at lower levels (few ng/L), UV-filters were also found in tap and groundwater. Swimming pool water is also a sink for UV-filters and its chlorine by-products, at the µg/L range, highlighting the benzophenone and benzimidazole derivatives. Soils and sediments are not frequently studied, but concentrations in the µg/L range have already been found especially for the benzophenone and crylene derivatives. Aquatic biota is frequently studied and UV-filters are found in the ng/g-dw range with higher values for fish and mussels. It has been concluded that more information regarding UVfilter degradation studies both in water and sediments is necessary and environmental occurrences should be monitored more frequently and deeply. SEHSDT -sequential extraction with high-speed dispersion tool; SLE -solid-liquid extraction; SPEsolid-phase extraction; SPF -sun protection factor; SPLE -selective pressurized liquid extraction;SPMDs -semipermeable membrane devices; SPME -solid phase microextraction; TD -thermal desorption; TCE -tetrachloroethylene; THF -tetrahydrofuran; Tl -toluene; UPLC -ultraperformance liquid chromatography; USE -ultrasound extraction; UV -ultraviolet; WTP -water treatment plant; WWTP -wastewater treatment plant 4

show abstract

“…Similarly, 2-ethyl-hexyl-4-trimethoxycinnamate (EHMC) was detected in seawater at levels of 144-264 ng/L (Benedé et al 2014;Bratkovics and Sapozhnikova 2011), whereas in freshwater, the concentration range was 7-3009 ng/L (Balmer et al 2005;Rodil et al 2009). Moreover, OC was detected in the reviewed studies with the lowest concentrations found in seawater, ranging from 187 to 1409 ng/L (Benedé et al 2014;Bratkovics and Sapozhnikova 2011) and 5 to 4301 ng/L in freshwater (Kameda et al 2011;Rodil et al 2009). …”

Section: Occurrence In Seawatermentioning

confidence: 96%

Occurrence of PPCPs in the marine environment: a review

Arpin-Pont

Bueno

Góméz

et al. 2014

Environ Sci Pollut Res

214

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little research has been conducted on the occurrence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the marine environment despite being increasingly impacted by these contaminants. This article reviews data on the occurrence of PPCPs in seawater, sediment, and organisms in the marine environment. Data pertaining to 196 pharmaceuticals and 37 personal care products reported from more than 50 marine sites are analyzed while taking sampling strategies and analytical methods into account. Particular attention is focused on the most frequently detected substances at highest concentrations. A snapshot of the most impacted marine sites is provided by comparing the highest concentrations reported for quantified substances. The present review reveals that: (i) PPCPs are widespread in seawater, particularly at sites impacted by anthropogenic activities, and (ii) the most frequently investigated and detected molecules in seawater and sediments are antibiotics, such as erythromycin. Moreover, this review points out other PPCPs of concern, such as ultraviolet filters, and underlines the scarcity of data on those substances despite recent evidence on their occurrence in marine organisms. The exposure of marine organisms in regard to these insufficient data is discussed.

show abstract

Non-porous membrane-assisted liquid–liquid extraction of UV filter compounds from water samples

Cited by 112 publications

References 21 publications

Dispersive solid-phase extraction based on oleic acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for UV-filter determination in water samples

Dispersive solid-phase extraction based on oleic acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for UV-filter determination in water samples

Advances in analytical methods and occurrence of organic UV-filters in the environment — A review

Occurrence of PPCPs in the marine environment: a review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About