2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013330.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these factors were not included in the analysis. However, these factors reportedly affect CRRT duration [4, 6]. Thirdly, this was a single‐center retrospective study, and the results may have been biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, these factors were not included in the analysis. However, these factors reportedly affect CRRT duration [4, 6]. Thirdly, this was a single‐center retrospective study, and the results may have been biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the commonly used anticoagulation methods in clinical practice include unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), regional citrate anti-coagulation (RCA), or no anti-coagulation. Previous studies have shown that blood flow velocity [4], treatment [4] and hemodilution mode [5,6], and other factors, in addition to anticoagulant factors, are related to CRRT time. Different anti-coagulant infusion modes have an impact on CRRT time [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous renal replacement therapy is an essential tool for the treatment of critically ill patients 27 ; however, the unplanned interruption of CRRT during treatment makes it impossible to deliver CRRT smoothly. This treatment interruption reduces the dose of CRRT, resulting in the inadequate control of uraemia, 28 which seriously affects the realisation of treatment goals and even disease prognosis. The unplanned interruption of CRRT can also lead to electrolyte disorders and body fluid imbalance in patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This study discussed the efficacy and safety of CVVH and CVVHDF, the two most utilised CRRT modalities in China’s PICUs combined with RCA, since this comparison has yet to be published for Chinese populations. Tsujimoto et al 10 analysed 20 studies involving 1143 patients receiving CRRT and found that filtre lifespan was longer with CVVHDF than with CVVH. A study on adult patients in the United Kingdom found that in non-septic patients requiring prolonged CRRT, CVVHDF reduced the incidence of filtre malfunctions, prolonged filtre lifespan, and had better efficacy than CVVH, 11 suggesting that CVVHDF may be a better option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%