2010
DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2010)062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-perturbative vacuum destabilization and D-brane dynamics

Abstract: Abstract:We analyze the process of string vacuum destabilization due to instanton induced superpotential couplings which depend linearly on charged fields. These nonperturbative instabilities result in potentials for the D-brane moduli and lead to processes of D-brane recombination, motion and partial moduli stabilization at the non-perturbative vacuum. By using techniques of D-brane instanton calculus, we explicitly compute this scalar potential in toroidal orbifold compactifications with magnetized D-branes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(211 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…k=1 U (4) c k , and the matter spectrum matches the one in [1] with corrections in [67] taken into account. For the D6 c j -branes, the orientifold image D-branes listed here have a different shape ( τ Z 2 c j ) = ( τ Z 2 c j ) + (1, 0, 1) because we performed a simultaneous sign-flip of the toroidal wrapping numbers on T 2…”
Section: -Loop Contribution To the Gauge Kinetic Function δmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…k=1 U (4) c k , and the matter spectrum matches the one in [1] with corrections in [67] taken into account. For the D6 c j -branes, the orientifold image D-branes listed here have a different shape ( τ Z 2 c j ) = ( τ Z 2 c j ) + (1, 0, 1) because we performed a simultaneous sign-flip of the toroidal wrapping numbers on T 2…”
Section: -Loop Contribution To the Gauge Kinetic Function δmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The displacement ( σ ai,i∈{3,4} ) = (1, 0, 0) modifies also the a i b j and a i c j sectors for i ∈ {3, 4} in table 26 and the corresponding entries in the anomaly-matrix (101) as follows: the a i b j sectors contribute (1, 1, 2, 1; 4, 1; 1, 1) + (1, 1, 2, 1; 1, 4; 1, 1) + (1, 1, 1, 2; 1, 4; 1, 1) + (1, 1, 1, 2; 4, 1; 1, 1) and the a i c j sectors (1, 1, 2, 1; 1, 1; 4, 1) + (1, 1, 2, 1; 1, 1; 1, 4) + (1, 1, 1, 2; 1, 1; 1, 4) + (1, 1, 1, 2; 1, 1; 4, 1) to the massless spectrum, and the associated anomaly matrix   . However, as communicated to me by some authors of [1], the spectrum in table 10 of [1]v3 belongs to a D-brane configuration without any discrete displacement and Wilson line parameters turned on, and the missing states in the a i a j sector with i ∈ {1, 2} and j ∈ {3, 4} can be found in table 2 of [67].…”
Section: Example 3 By Angelantonj Et Al Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See[61] for an explicit computation of the instanton generated scalar potential for open string moduli in toroidal orbifold compactifications with magnetized D-branes. 14 This is similar -but slightly different -to the loophole discussed in[14] to achieve Natural Inflation consistently with the strong form of the Generalized Weak Gravity Conjecture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%