1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(88)90182-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-perturbative aspects in supersymmetric gauge theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
527
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(543 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
16
527
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy of introducing so-called spurion fields is not new. In the context of supersymmetry it has been used, for instance in [68][69][70], to derive nonrenormalization theorems and even exact results. Another option is to not restrict the spurion superfields to constant values, in order to introduce an explicit breaking of supersymmetry [71,72].…”
Section: Duality and Holomorphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy of introducing so-called spurion fields is not new. In the context of supersymmetry it has been used, for instance in [68][69][70], to derive nonrenormalization theorems and even exact results. Another option is to not restrict the spurion superfields to constant values, in order to introduce an explicit breaking of supersymmetry [71,72].…”
Section: Duality and Holomorphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For m ≥ Λ there may be additional states to consider, and we are not guaranteed that vacuum rearrangements will not take place. However, we note that the arguments of Kovner and Shifman in favor of the new vacuum rely heavily on the vacuum averaging hypothesis [7] for SCI calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus in the instanton approximation 0|Tr λ 2 |0 = 0, and one apparently has a violation of cluster decomposition. A possible resolution to this puzzle, known as the "vacuum averaging hypothesis" was proposed by Amati et al [7], within which the SCI calculation reflects an average over the vacua of the theory. This nicely explains why 0|Tr λ 2 (x) Tr λ 2 (x ′ )|0 for example is nonzero, while a direct instanton calculation of 0|Tr λ 2 |0 at strong coupling necessarily vanishes, since (for gauge group SU(2)) one obtains contributions of opposite sign from the two chirally asymmetric vacua.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, perturbative calculations in field theory are typically ignorant about the vacuum state. For example, an argument as to why a direct perturbative calculation of the gaugino condensate yields zero is that the perturbative analysis averages over all vacua [42,43]. We wish to confront our results with a perturbative field theory calculation and, therefore, we must average over all inequivalent vacua, which can be equivalently expressed as the following change of renormalization scheme, 6 τ → τ + i N 2π It is interesting to observe that, in this renormalization scheme, the coupling (5.5) does not diverge for ρ = c = 0, in contrast to the exact coupling (4.12).…”
Section: Beta Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%