2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.02.438180
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-parametric synergy modeling with Gaussian processes

Abstract: Background: Understanding the synergetic and antagonistic effects of combinations of drugs and toxins is vital for many applications, including treatment of multifactorial diseases and ecotoxicological monitoring. Synergy is usually assessed by comparing the response of drug combinations to a predicted non-interactive response from reference (null) models. Possible choices of null models are Loewe additivity, Bliss independence and the recently rediscovered Hand model. A different approach is taken by the MuSy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current literature, there are examples that use a probabilistic model to incorporate uncertainty in their outputs. Shapovalova et al developed Hand-GP [13], a non-parametric model based on the combination of the Hand model with Gaussian processes, providing more believable uncertainty estimation than MuSyC in some cases. However, Hand-GP does not incorporate the 1D Hill equation that imposed biological constraints useful for providing interpretability of the model outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current literature, there are examples that use a probabilistic model to incorporate uncertainty in their outputs. Shapovalova et al developed Hand-GP [13], a non-parametric model based on the combination of the Hand model with Gaussian processes, providing more believable uncertainty estimation than MuSyC in some cases. However, Hand-GP does not incorporate the 1D Hill equation that imposed biological constraints useful for providing interpretability of the model outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%