2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-008-0134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-parametric statistical background modeling for efficient foreground region detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
35
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…6-8, it can be found that the proposed method has outperformed the MoG method in these selected situations. Table I shows the average of the similarity measures using " (21)," which is evaluated on 20 randomly selected frames of each sequence. The quantitative evaluation agrees with the conclusions from the visual observation of the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6-8, it can be found that the proposed method has outperformed the MoG method in these selected situations. Table I shows the average of the similarity measures using " (21)," which is evaluated on 20 randomly selected frames of each sequence. The quantitative evaluation agrees with the conclusions from the visual observation of the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was able to learn sudden illumination changes. However, slow model training speed and sensitivity to model selection and initialization are problems of these methods [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the material surface may have a weak texture, algorithms for texture analysis and identification [38][39][40][41], besides their computational cost, cannot be applied here as texture is often distorted at the boundaries of the defect. Moreover, some texture may easily be confounded with the defect itself (cf.…”
Section: Background Subtraction (Binarization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, a d-variate Gaussian has been chosen as the kernel estimator function, K H , due to its continuity, differentiability and locality properties [6]. In order to reduce the computational requirements, a diagonal bandwidth matrix has been applied.…”
Section: A Background Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%