2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02905857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-overlapping domain decomposition methods in structural mechanics

Abstract: SummaryThe modern design of industrial structures leads to very complex simulations characterized by nonlinearities, high heterogeneities, tortuous geometries... Whatever the modelization may be, such an analysis leads to the solution to a family of large ill-conditioned linear systems. In this paper we study strategies to efficiently solve to linear system based on non-overlapping domain decomposition methods. We present a review of most employed approaches and their strong connections. We outline their mecha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
165
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has to be noted that the non-intrusive local enrichment of NURBS patches may not be the only application of such a method. Indeed, taking advantage of the Lagrange multipliers approach, the proposed methodology seems to be adapted to the development of more regular non-overlapping domain decomposition methods to be used for high performance computing on parallel computer architectures (see, e.g., [42][43][44] for the elaboration in the context of classical FEM). In addition, in the same idea of what is performed in [52], such a coupling may also serve as a basis to develop a strategy that could connect different NURBS patches while ensuring a C 1 continuity at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it has to be noted that the non-intrusive local enrichment of NURBS patches may not be the only application of such a method. Indeed, taking advantage of the Lagrange multipliers approach, the proposed methodology seems to be adapted to the development of more regular non-overlapping domain decomposition methods to be used for high performance computing on parallel computer architectures (see, e.g., [42][43][44] for the elaboration in the context of classical FEM). In addition, in the same idea of what is performed in [52], such a coupling may also serve as a basis to develop a strategy that could connect different NURBS patches while ensuring a C 1 continuity at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the communication between the subdomains is performed via the Lagrange multiplier only. This feature is the basis of the non-overlapping domain decomposition methods developed for high performance computing on parallel computer architectures (see, e.g., [42][43][44]). In the same idea, such a property enables to build non-intrusive coupling algorithms for the modeling of local behaviors (see, e.g., [14,12,32,[34][35][36]).…”
Section: A Review Of the Classical Mortar Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FETI-1 [13,14,12,23] is a non-overlapping DDM [16]. Thus, it is based on decomposing the original spatial domain into non-overlapping subdomains.…”
Section: Permonfllopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first option is to use a numerical approach [16], and the second one is to generate R as rigid body modes from the mesh nodal coordinates [22]. The latter is typical for TFETI and is considered here.…”
Section: Permonfllopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of such huge calculations, multiscale approaches based on domain decomposition methods [1] or on model superposition [2,3] are widely used. Another popular family of strategies is based on computational homogenization, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%