2005
DOI: 10.1088/1464-4266/7/5/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-orthogonal positive operator valued measure phase distributions of one- and two-mode electromagnetic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase locking.-It is well-known that there is not a unique way to define the phase operator in quantum mechanics [42]. One option [43] that has been used to study quantum synchronization [26] is the phase distribution P(φ) = 1 2π φ|ρ|φ with |φ = ∞ n=0 e inφ |n , yielding 2πP(φ) − 1 = ∞ m n=0 ρ m,n e iφ(n−m) . Our perturbative steady-state solution (6) contains only terms with n − m = ±1, so P(φ) = 1 2π + η 1 cos φ + η 2 sin φ with To convert the phase distribution P(φ) into a single number characterizing the tendency to synchronize, we use the absolute value of the measure defined in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase locking.-It is well-known that there is not a unique way to define the phase operator in quantum mechanics [42]. One option [43] that has been used to study quantum synchronization [26] is the phase distribution P(φ) = 1 2π φ|ρ|φ with |φ = ∞ n=0 e inφ |n , yielding 2πP(φ) − 1 = ∞ m n=0 ρ m,n e iφ(n−m) . Our perturbative steady-state solution (6) contains only terms with n − m = ±1, so P(φ) = 1 2π + η 1 cos φ + η 2 sin φ with To convert the phase distribution P(φ) into a single number characterizing the tendency to synchronize, we use the absolute value of the measure defined in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in general, a distribution based on a quasiprobability distributions is not unique as other representations could be used [22], which would give different results. We circumvent this ambiguity by directly calculating a relative phase distribution from the density matrix using phase states [23]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally I would like to point out that in another approach to phase measurements in MZI, which is different from the phase estimation approach, there is a quasi-conjugate uncertainty relation between the 'relative phase operator' and the operator representing the difference in the number of photons and the complete quantum phase distribution can be obtained (See for this approach in [47], and in the long list of References included). In the present work we have followed, however, the 'phase estimation methods' in which is a classical parameter and it has been shown that by using photon counting measurements these methods become very efficient for deriving the two-mode phase uncertainty in MZI.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%