Non‐operative Management of Small Bowel Obstruction in Patients with No Previous Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Abstract

While the contemporary management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) often includes a trial of non-operative management (NOM), surgical dogma dictates urgent operative exploration in patients without previous abdominal surgery. This dogma has been challenged by recent evidence suggesting most obstructions in this population are adhesive in nature. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the feasibility of NOM in patients with SBO and no history of previous abdominal surgery, to examine the etiologies of SBO in this population, and to explore the rate of adverse events seen following NOM. Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to September 24, 2019. Articles reporting on NOM for SBO in patients without previous abdominal surgery and without clinical or radiographic features necessitating an emergent operation were included. Data were combined to obtain a pooled proportion of patients discharged without operation following a trial of NOM. 6 studies reporting on a total of 272 patients were included. The pooled proportion of patients discharged following NOM was 49.5% (95% CI 23.7-75.3%). Adhesions were found to be the predominant cause of obstruction. NOM did not appear to increase short-term complications. Most SBOs in patients without previous abdominal surgery are adhesive in nature and many patients can be discharged from hospital without surgery. While the short-term outcomes of NOM are acceptable, future studies are needed to address the long-term outcomes and safety of NOM as a treatment strategy for SBO in patients without previous abdominal surgery.

Small Bowel Obstruction in Virgin Abdomen: Predictors of Surgical Intervention Need in Resource-Limited Setting

“…The scenario becomes more intricate when noting that this failure rate climbs to 50% in patients who did not receive the oral contrast. 22 Furthermore, a recent systematic review, incorporating two cohort studies and four case reports, posited the success rate of conservative management to lie between 50 and 70% for SBO-VA. 23 In comparison to these findings, our research reported a success rate of 90.6% for non-operative strategies in the context of SBO-VA.…”

Ileal endometriosis: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction in the virgin abdomen

“…In recent years, there has been a move towards trialling non‐operative management of SBO in the virgin abdomen in well patients. However, failure of non‐operative management and non‐resolving SBO warrants exploratory surgery, and up to 50% of non‐operatively managed SBOs in a virgin abdomen will proceed to surgical intervention 8 …”

“…However, failure of non-operative management and non-resolving SBO warrants exploratory surgery, and up to 50% of non-operatively managed SBOs in a virgin abdomen will proceed to surgical intervention. 8 The diagnosis of CD relies on the combination of clinical findings, radiological evidence, serology and histology. However, with a >90% sensitivity and specificity of MRE in detection of active CD, it is of increasing clinical utility in the diagnosis and management of CD.…”

Unveiling new patterns: A surgical deep learning model for intestinal obstruction management

“…The decision-making process surrounding operative versus nonoperative management (NOM) in cases of intestinal obstruction presents a significant challenge in the field of medical practice. 7,8 Despite the wealth of radiological and clinical data available, the distinction between these management approaches remains elusive.…”