2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2484(03)00030-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-occlusal dental microwear variability in a sample of Middle and Late Pleistocene human populations from Europe and the Near East

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, independent evidence supports the contention that the farmers' diet consists of softer food, and can be found independently in dental microwear analyses and molecular genetics studies of crop plants. Differences in food availability, stone tool technology, and food-processing techniques seem to be responsible for a decrease in microwear through time (Pérez-Pérez et al, 2003). Microwear features tend to be more abundant in groups whose diet was abrasive than those who ate soft foods (Romero et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, independent evidence supports the contention that the farmers' diet consists of softer food, and can be found independently in dental microwear analyses and molecular genetics studies of crop plants. Differences in food availability, stone tool technology, and food-processing techniques seem to be responsible for a decrease in microwear through time (Pérez-Pérez et al, 2003). Microwear features tend to be more abundant in groups whose diet was abrasive than those who ate soft foods (Romero et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the occlusal surface has been estab lished to 500x, and usually only the protoconid is analyzed (Teaford, 1991;Romero and de juan, 2005;Mahoney, 2006). However, the analysis of buccal surfaces has generally been performed at 100x (Fine and Craig, 1981;Lalueza Fox, 1996;Perez Perez et al, 2003). This protocol cannot be applied to the non dietary microwear features because their morphology, disposition, and size require examination of a wider field of view.…”
Section: Polished Enamelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different microwear patterns on buccal and occlusal enamel surfaces might result from the same diet. Buccal microwear patterns, not affected by tooth-tooth contact, have been shown to be a good indicator of dietary-related abrasion in primates, as well as in hominins [Pérez-Pérez et al, 1999;Galbany et al, 2002;Pérez-Pérez et al, 2003;Galbany and Pérez-Pérez, 2004], although further methodological standardizations are still required.…”
Section: Dietary Habits Of the Fossil Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%