2015
DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1061053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-obsessive–compulsive anxiety disorders in child and adolescent mental health services – Are they underdiagnosed, and how accurate is referral information?

Abstract: The use of a standardized diagnostic interview in consecutively referred children yielded significantly higher rates of anxiety disorders than the NPR prevalence rates. Co-morbid ADHD or disruptive disorder may contribute to the underdiagnosing of anxiety disorders. Diagnostic instruments covering the whole range of child psychiatric symptoms should be implemented routinely in CAMHS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the study sample was large, the number of therapists who reported on techniques used for anxiety disorders was relatively small. While this is consistent with the broader literature showing that youth with anxiety disorders present less frequently to treatment in the community relative to disruptive disorders (Merikangas et al, 2011) and that anxiety diagnoses go undetected when youth with anxiety do present (Hansen, Oerbeck, Skirbekk, & Kristensen, 2016), our ability to detect predictors of clinician exposure use was likely underpowered and the marginal effects found should be interpreted with some caution and replicated in additional samples. Clinician use of exposure therapy in this sample also relied on retrospective self-report of techniques used with a representative case, rather than a comprehensive assessment of exposure use across clinician caseloads.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…While the study sample was large, the number of therapists who reported on techniques used for anxiety disorders was relatively small. While this is consistent with the broader literature showing that youth with anxiety disorders present less frequently to treatment in the community relative to disruptive disorders (Merikangas et al, 2011) and that anxiety diagnoses go undetected when youth with anxiety do present (Hansen, Oerbeck, Skirbekk, & Kristensen, 2016), our ability to detect predictors of clinician exposure use was likely underpowered and the marginal effects found should be interpreted with some caution and replicated in additional samples. Clinician use of exposure therapy in this sample also relied on retrospective self-report of techniques used with a representative case, rather than a comprehensive assessment of exposure use across clinician caseloads.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Overall homotypic comorbidity was in line with the findings reported by Hammerness and colleagues in the United States (13), with most anxiety disorders associated with additional diagnoses of anxiety. Although comorbidity estimates reported by Esbjørn and colleagues in Denmark (12) and by Hansen and colleagues in Norway (14) were markedly lower as compared with the findings of the current study, observations of heterotypic comorbidity as the more prevalent type were similar. Moreover, the percentage point (pp) differences between homotypic and heterotypic comorbidity in those studies (40 pp and 46 pp) were similar to the difference observed in the current study (48 pp), which implies that this comorbidity pattern is a clinical characteristic that can be expected among anxious youths in nonanxiety-specialized psychiatric settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, relating the findings of the current study to three previously reported studies of prevalence in non-specialized psychiatry is curtailed, because the other studies all included either combined samples of children and adolescents or only younger children (12)(13)(14). With this limitation in mind, the prevalence of any anxiety disorder observed in this study is more akin to the estimates of 57.7% reported by Hammerness and colleagues in the United States (13) and 32.7% reported by Hansen and colleagues in Norway (14) rather than to the rate of 5.7% reported by Esbjørn and colleagues in Denmark (12). This must be viewed in relation to the methodological similarities and differences of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations