2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-negatively constrained image deblurring with an inexact interior point method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, problem (2) does not have a closed-form solution on account of the inequality constraints, even for simple regularizations, hence an iterative solver must be used. Several resolution approaches are available, either based on projected gradient strategies [39,40], ADMM [41], primal-dual schemes [42], or interior point techniques [43]. Standard interior point methods require to invert several n × n linear systems, which leads to a high computational complexity for large scale problems.…”
Section: Interior Point Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, problem (2) does not have a closed-form solution on account of the inequality constraints, even for simple regularizations, hence an iterative solver must be used. Several resolution approaches are available, either based on projected gradient strategies [39,40], ADMM [41], primal-dual schemes [42], or interior point techniques [43]. Standard interior point methods require to invert several n × n linear systems, which leads to a high computational complexity for large scale problems.…”
Section: Interior Point Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various algorithms were developed on the basis of convex optimization techniques to compute the minimizer of the variational problem (1.2), such as SpaRSA (sparse reconstruction by separable approximation) [7], Nesterovs algorithm [8], FISTA (fast iterative shrinkage/thresolding algorithm) [9], TwIST (two-step IST) [10]. These methods were shown to be considerably faster than earlier methods, including interior-point methods [11,12] and iterative thresholding ideas [13,14]. Very recently, a new algorithm named SALSA (split augmented Lagrangian shrinkage algorithm) [15] was proposed and shown to be more efficient than TwIST, FISTA, and SpaRSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From a numerical perspective, IPMs have demonstrated very good performance on several challenging applications, such as image reconstruction [8] and multispectral image unmixing [9]. It is worth noting that most of interior point approaches rely on first or second-order methods and, therefore, assume that the objective function is at least twice-differentiable [10,11]. However, in many image processing applications, the quality of the solution and its robustness to noise may be improved by including a nondifferentiable regularization term in the objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%