2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cibcb.2019.8791474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-negative Matrix Tri-Factorization for Data Integration and Network-based Drug Repositioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…random walk (RW) approach; such as RWHNDR ( Luo et al , 2018a ), TL-HGBI ( Wang et al , 2014b ), MBiRW ( Luo et al , 2016 ); and matrix factorization (MF) approach; such as DRRS ( Luo et al , 2018a ), KBMF ( Gönen et al , 2013 ), MSBMF ( Yang et al , 2021 ), SCPMF( Meng et al , 2021 ). RW approach is more scalable and popular, but MF approach achieves higher accuracy ( Luo et al , 2018a ).There are also other MF-based methods which instead of drug-disease networks, they use drug-protein network for DR purpose such as Ceddia et al (2020) , Ceddia et al (2019) and Dissez et al (2019) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…random walk (RW) approach; such as RWHNDR ( Luo et al , 2018a ), TL-HGBI ( Wang et al , 2014b ), MBiRW ( Luo et al , 2016 ); and matrix factorization (MF) approach; such as DRRS ( Luo et al , 2018a ), KBMF ( Gönen et al , 2013 ), MSBMF ( Yang et al , 2021 ), SCPMF( Meng et al , 2021 ). RW approach is more scalable and popular, but MF approach achieves higher accuracy ( Luo et al , 2018a ).There are also other MF-based methods which instead of drug-disease networks, they use drug-protein network for DR purpose such as Ceddia et al (2020) , Ceddia et al (2019) and Dissez et al (2019) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its mainstream algorithms include: network inference, [9][10][11][12] random walk, 13,14 and matrix factorization. 15,16 These methods usually rely heavily on the richness of interaction network data. In addition, many studies that used such methods proposed the need to construct more complete and large-scale data information to improve prediction performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most machine learning-based methods often depend on typical classifiers trained by a collection of features and known drug–disease associations, such as the Support Vector Machine (SVM), the Random Forest (RF), and Lasso Regression (LR), which do not achieve the desired performance. ,, The literature mining methods depend on the term co-occurrences and semantic inference of keywords of interest to infer new drug–disease associations. , Due to the ambiguity of the nature of natural language and the limited accuracy of text mining techniques, it is difficult for literature mining-based methods to acquire reliable predictions . Network-based methods attempt to find new indications for approved drugs using topological characteristics of drug–disease networks to find associations linking pathogenesis and symptoms to known drugs. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%